Canada vs India: Electricity Compared
Canada generated 660 TWh of electricity in 2025 and India 2,080 TWh, according to Ember. Canada's largest source was hydro (52.8%); India's was coal (70.9%). Each kWh generated emitted 192 gCO2/kWh in Canada and 671 gCO2/kWh in India. These are Ember annual statistics for 2025, compiled from national sources; they are not real time.
Who is bigger and who is cleaner? India is the bigger electricity producer, generating 3.2 times as much as Canada in 2025 (2,080 TWh against 660 TWh). Canada has the cleaner electricity by carbon intensity, at 192 gCO2/kWh against 671 gCO2/kWh in India in 2025.
Why this comparison: both among the 20 largest electricity users.
Open this comparison in the interactive tool to add more countries or change the metric.
Key Facts
- Coal supplied 70.9% of India's electricity in 2025, against 2.7% in Canada.
- India's electricity was 3.5 times as carbon intensive as Canada's in 2025, at 671 gCO2/kWh against 192 gCO2/kWh.
- Carbon intensity rose 18% in Canada between 2020 and 2025, while it fell 5% in India.
- The average person in Canada used 16.09 MWh of electricity in 2025, 11.3 times as much as in India (1.42 MWh).
- Low carbon sources supplied 76.5% of Canada's electricity in 2025 and 26.6% of India's.
- Electricity demand in 2025 was 654 TWh in Canada and 2,081 TWh in India.
Key Figures, 2025
Ember annual statistics| Measure | Canada | India |
|---|---|---|
| Total generation | 660 TWh | 2,080 TWh |
| Electricity demand | 654 TWh | 2,081 TWh |
| Demand per person | 16.09 MWh | 1.42 MWh |
| Carbon intensity | 192 gCO2/kWh | 671 gCO2/kWh |
| Power sector emissions | 126 MtCO2 | 1,396 MtCO2 |
| Low carbon share | 76.5% | 26.6% |
| Largest source | Hydro 52.8% | Coal 70.9% |
Generation Mix, 2025
Share of generationCarbon Intensity, 1985 to 2025
Ember annual statistics| Year | Canada | India |
|---|---|---|
| 1985 | 191 gCO2/kWh | 635 gCO2/kWh |
| 1986 | 172 gCO2/kWh | 652 gCO2/kWh |
| 1987 | 190 gCO2/kWh | 690 gCO2/kWh |
| 1988 | 206 gCO2/kWh | 684 gCO2/kWh |
| 1989 | 225 gCO2/kWh | 686 gCO2/kWh |
| 1990 | 206 gCO2/kWh | 679 gCO2/kWh |
| 1991 | 202 gCO2/kWh | 683 gCO2/kWh |
| 1992 | 209 gCO2/kWh | 700 gCO2/kWh |
| 1993 | 191 gCO2/kWh | 713 gCO2/kWh |
| 1994 | 188 gCO2/kWh | 705 gCO2/kWh |
| 1995 | 199 gCO2/kWh | 723 gCO2/kWh |
| 1996 | 192 gCO2/kWh | 738 gCO2/kWh |
| 1997 | 213 gCO2/kWh | 738 gCO2/kWh |
| 1998 | 241 gCO2/kWh | 720 gCO2/kWh |
| 1999 | 235 gCO2/kWh | 729 gCO2/kWh |
| 2000 | 246 gCO2/kWh | 740 gCO2/kWh |
| 2001 | 256 gCO2/kWh | 747 gCO2/kWh |
| 2002 | 245 gCO2/kWh | 756 gCO2/kWh |
| 2003 | 252 gCO2/kWh | 758 gCO2/kWh |
| 2004 | 235 gCO2/kWh | 724 gCO2/kWh |
| 2005 | 225 gCO2/kWh | 734 gCO2/kWh |
| 2006 | 217 gCO2/kWh | 723 gCO2/kWh |
| 2007 | 228 gCO2/kWh | 718 gCO2/kWh |
| 2008 | 214 gCO2/kWh | 733 gCO2/kWh |
| 2009 | 204 gCO2/kWh | 745 gCO2/kWh |
| 2010 | 215 gCO2/kWh | 739 gCO2/kWh |
| 2011 | 206 gCO2/kWh | 722 gCO2/kWh |
| 2012 | 193 gCO2/kWh | 743 gCO2/kWh |
| 2013 | 187 gCO2/kWh | 739 gCO2/kWh |
| 2014 | 189 gCO2/kWh | 743 gCO2/kWh |
| 2015 | 184 gCO2/kWh | 751 gCO2/kWh |
| 2016 | 181 gCO2/kWh | 752 gCO2/kWh |
| 2017 | 172 gCO2/kWh | 743 gCO2/kWh |
| 2018 | 171 gCO2/kWh | 738 gCO2/kWh |
| 2019 | 170 gCO2/kWh | 723 gCO2/kWh |
| 2020 | 162 gCO2/kWh | 710 gCO2/kWh |
| 2021 | 165 gCO2/kWh | 716 gCO2/kWh |
| 2022 | 161 gCO2/kWh | 707 gCO2/kWh |
| 2023 | 174 gCO2/kWh | 714 gCO2/kWh |
| 2024 | 185 gCO2/kWh | 707 gCO2/kWh |
| 2025 | 192 gCO2/kWh | 671 gCO2/kWh |
Demand per Person, 1985 to 2025
Ember annual statistics| Year | Canada | India |
|---|---|---|
| 1985 | n/a | n/a |
| 1986 | n/a | n/a |
| 1987 | n/a | n/a |
| 1988 | n/a | n/a |
| 1989 | n/a | n/a |
| 1990 | n/a | n/a |
| 1991 | n/a | n/a |
| 1992 | n/a | n/a |
| 1993 | n/a | n/a |
| 1994 | n/a | n/a |
| 1995 | n/a | n/a |
| 1996 | n/a | n/a |
| 1997 | n/a | n/a |
| 1998 | n/a | n/a |
| 1999 | n/a | n/a |
| 2000 | 18.39 MWh | 0.54 MWh |
| 2001 | 18.12 MWh | 0.55 MWh |
| 2002 | 18.34 MWh | 0.56 MWh |
| 2003 | 18.30 MWh | 0.57 MWh |
| 2004 | 18.30 MWh | 0.62 MWh |
| 2005 | 18.39 MWh | 0.61 MWh |
| 2006 | 17.99 MWh | 0.64 MWh |
| 2007 | 18.23 MWh | 0.67 MWh |
| 2008 | 18.03 MWh | 0.69 MWh |
| 2009 | 17.15 MWh | 0.72 MWh |
| 2010 | 17.02 MWh | 0.76 MWh |
| 2011 | 17.41 MWh | 0.82 MWh |
| 2012 | 16.89 MWh | 0.86 MWh |
| 2013 | 17.11 MWh | 0.88 MWh |
| 2014 | 17.04 MWh | 0.96 MWh |
| 2015 | 16.73 MWh | 0.99 MWh |
| 2016 | 16.60 MWh | 1.04 MWh |
| 2017 | 16.49 MWh | 1.07 MWh |
| 2018 | 16.44 MWh | 1.14 MWh |
| 2019 | 16.11 MWh | 1.15 MWh |
| 2020 | 15.67 MWh | 1.12 MWh |
| 2021 | 15.74 MWh | 1.19 MWh |
| 2022 | 15.79 MWh | 1.27 MWh |
| 2023 | 15.61 MWh | 1.33 MWh |
| 2024 | 15.71 MWh | 1.40 MWh |
| 2025 | 16.09 MWh | 1.42 MWh |
Canada history · India history
Source: Ember (ember-energy.org), licensed under CC BY 4.0. Data as of 2025.
Related
Cite this page
World Power Monitor. (2025). Canada vs India: Electricity Compared. https://worldpowermonitor.com/compare/canada-vs-india/
World Power Monitor. Canada vs India: Electricity Compared. Data as of 2025. Data from Ember. https://worldpowermonitor.com/compare/canada-vs-india/
@misc{wpm_compare_canada_vs_india_2025,
title = {{Canada vs India: Electricity Compared}},
author = {{World Power Monitor}},
year = {2025},
note = {Data as of 2025. Data from Ember.},
url = {https://worldpowermonitor.com/compare/canada-vs-india/}
} Permalink: https://worldpowermonitor.com/compare/canada-vs-india/
The Copy buttons add today's date as the access date.