Argentina vs Brazil: Electricity Compared
Argentina generated 153 TWh of electricity in 2025 and Brazil 764 TWh, according to Ember. Argentina's largest source was gas (56.0%); Brazil's was hydro (52.1%). Each kWh generated emitted 346 gCO2/kWh in Argentina and 109 gCO2/kWh in Brazil. These are Ember annual statistics for 2025, compiled from national sources; they are not real time.
Who is bigger and who is cleaner? Brazil is the bigger electricity producer, generating 5.0 times as much as Argentina in 2025 (764 TWh against 153 TWh). Brazil has the cleaner electricity by carbon intensity, at 109 gCO2/kWh against 346 gCO2/kWh in Argentina in 2025.
Why this comparison: neighbours by land border or interconnector, similar electricity demand on the same continent and a well known regional or sporting rivalry.
Open this comparison in the interactive tool to add more countries or change the metric.
Key Facts
- Gas supplied 56.0% of Argentina's electricity in 2025, against 7.8% in Brazil.
- Argentina's electricity was 3.2 times as carbon intensive as Brazil's in 2025, at 346 gCO2/kWh against 109 gCO2/kWh.
- Low carbon sources supplied 40.9% of Argentina's electricity in 2025 and 88.9% of Brazil's.
- Electricity demand in 2025 was 163 TWh in Argentina and 775 TWh in Brazil.
Key Figures, 2025
Ember annual statistics| Measure | Argentina | Brazil |
|---|---|---|
| Total generation | 153 TWh | 764 TWh |
| Electricity demand | 163 TWh | 775 TWh |
| Demand per person | 3.54 MWh | 3.58 MWh |
| Carbon intensity | 346 gCO2/kWh | 109 gCO2/kWh |
| Power sector emissions | 53.0 MtCO2 | 83.4 MtCO2 |
| Low carbon share | 40.9% | 88.9% |
| Largest source | Gas 56.0% | Hydro 52.1% |
Generation Mix, 2025
Share of generationCarbon Intensity, 1985 to 2025
Ember annual statistics| Year | Argentina | Brazil |
|---|---|---|
| 1985 | 260 gCO2/kWh | 61 gCO2/kWh |
| 1986 | 286 gCO2/kWh | 85 gCO2/kWh |
| 1987 | 289 gCO2/kWh | 74 gCO2/kWh |
| 1988 | 366 gCO2/kWh | 66 gCO2/kWh |
| 1989 | 383 gCO2/kWh | 66 gCO2/kWh |
| 1990 | 307 gCO2/kWh | 60 gCO2/kWh |
| 1991 | 340 gCO2/kWh | 62 gCO2/kWh |
| 1992 | 324 gCO2/kWh | 63 gCO2/kWh |
| 1993 | 300 gCO2/kWh | 61 gCO2/kWh |
| 1994 | 284 gCO2/kWh | 61 gCO2/kWh |
| 1995 | 304 gCO2/kWh | 63 gCO2/kWh |
| 1996 | 341 gCO2/kWh | 68 gCO2/kWh |
| 1997 | 301 gCO2/kWh | 71 gCO2/kWh |
| 1998 | 323 gCO2/kWh | 71 gCO2/kWh |
| 1999 | 379 gCO2/kWh | 90 gCO2/kWh |
| 2000 | 355 gCO2/kWh | 89 gCO2/kWh |
| 2001 | 302 gCO2/kWh | 106 gCO2/kWh |
| 2002 | 295 gCO2/kWh | 97 gCO2/kWh |
| 2003 | 316 gCO2/kWh | 91 gCO2/kWh |
| 2004 | 358 gCO2/kWh | 102 gCO2/kWh |
| 2005 | 357 gCO2/kWh | 99 gCO2/kWh |
| 2006 | 350 gCO2/kWh | 96 gCO2/kWh |
| 2007 | 388 gCO2/kWh | 91 gCO2/kWh |
| 2008 | 401 gCO2/kWh | 114 gCO2/kWh |
| 2009 | 382 gCO2/kWh | 87 gCO2/kWh |
| 2010 | 402 gCO2/kWh | 114 gCO2/kWh |
| 2011 | 420 gCO2/kWh | 100 gCO2/kWh |
| 2012 | 432 gCO2/kWh | 128 gCO2/kWh |
| 2013 | 422 gCO2/kWh | 168 gCO2/kWh |
| 2014 | 424 gCO2/kWh | 193 gCO2/kWh |
| 2015 | 427 gCO2/kWh | 189 gCO2/kWh |
| 2016 | 432 gCO2/kWh | 150 gCO2/kWh |
| 2017 | 425 gCO2/kWh | 156 gCO2/kWh |
| 2018 | 414 gCO2/kWh | 137 gCO2/kWh |
| 2019 | 398 gCO2/kWh | 142 gCO2/kWh |
| 2020 | 395 gCO2/kWh | 133 gCO2/kWh |
| 2021 | 407 gCO2/kWh | 168 gCO2/kWh |
| 2022 | 393 gCO2/kWh | 103 gCO2/kWh |
| 2023 | 351 gCO2/kWh | 96 gCO2/kWh |
| 2024 | 345 gCO2/kWh | 106 gCO2/kWh |
| 2025 | 346 gCO2/kWh | 109 gCO2/kWh |
Demand per Person, 1985 to 2025
Ember annual statistics| Year | Argentina | Brazil |
|---|---|---|
| 1985 | n/a | n/a |
| 1986 | n/a | n/a |
| 1987 | n/a | n/a |
| 1988 | n/a | n/a |
| 1989 | n/a | n/a |
| 1990 | n/a | n/a |
| 1991 | n/a | n/a |
| 1992 | n/a | n/a |
| 1993 | n/a | n/a |
| 1994 | n/a | n/a |
| 1995 | n/a | n/a |
| 1996 | n/a | n/a |
| 1997 | n/a | n/a |
| 1998 | n/a | n/a |
| 1999 | n/a | n/a |
| 2000 | 2.42 MWh | 2.25 MWh |
| 2001 | 2.44 MWh | 2.08 MWh |
| 2002 | 2.38 MWh | 2.14 MWh |
| 2003 | 2.53 MWh | 2.23 MWh |
| 2004 | 2.67 MWh | 2.33 MWh |
| 2005 | 2.80 MWh | 2.39 MWh |
| 2006 | 2.92 MWh | 2.47 MWh |
| 2007 | 3.03 MWh | 2.57 MWh |
| 2008 | 3.15 MWh | 2.66 MWh |
| 2009 | 3.15 MWh | 2.64 MWh |
| 2010 | 3.26 MWh | 2.84 MWh |
| 2011 | 3.34 MWh | 2.91 MWh |
| 2012 | 3.41 MWh | 3.01 MWh |
| 2013 | 3.46 MWh | 3.08 MWh |
| 2014 | 3.45 MWh | 3.12 MWh |
| 2015 | 3.55 MWh | 3.05 MWh |
| 2016 | 3.57 MWh | 3.05 MWh |
| 2017 | 3.52 MWh | 3.06 MWh |
| 2018 | 3.50 MWh | 3.09 MWh |
| 2019 | 3.34 MWh | 3.17 MWh |
| 2020 | 3.31 MWh | 3.13 MWh |
| 2021 | 3.44 MWh | 3.24 MWh |
| 2022 | 3.49 MWh | 3.28 MWh |
| 2023 | 3.60 MWh | 3.43 MWh |
| 2024 | 3.54 MWh | 3.57 MWh |
| 2025 | 3.54 MWh | 3.58 MWh |
Argentina history · Brazil history
Source: Ember (ember-energy.org), licensed under CC BY 4.0. Data as of 2025.
Related
Cite this page
World Power Monitor. (2025). Argentina vs Brazil: Electricity Compared. https://worldpowermonitor.com/compare/argentina-vs-brazil/
World Power Monitor. Argentina vs Brazil: Electricity Compared. Data as of 2025. Data from Ember. https://worldpowermonitor.com/compare/argentina-vs-brazil/
@misc{wpm_compare_argentina_vs_brazil_2025,
title = {{Argentina vs Brazil: Electricity Compared}},
author = {{World Power Monitor}},
year = {2025},
note = {Data as of 2025. Data from Ember.},
url = {https://worldpowermonitor.com/compare/argentina-vs-brazil/}
} Permalink: https://worldpowermonitor.com/compare/argentina-vs-brazil/
The Copy buttons add today's date as the access date.