Brazil vs India: Electricity Compared
Brazil generated 764 TWh of electricity in 2025 and India 2,080 TWh, according to Ember. Brazil's largest source was hydro (52.1%); India's was coal (70.9%). Each kWh generated emitted 109 gCO2/kWh in Brazil and 671 gCO2/kWh in India. These are Ember annual statistics for 2025, compiled from national sources; they are not real time.
Who is bigger and who is cleaner? India is the bigger electricity producer, generating 2.7 times as much as Brazil in 2025 (2,080 TWh against 764 TWh). Brazil has the cleaner electricity by carbon intensity, at 109 gCO2/kWh against 671 gCO2/kWh in India in 2025.
Why this comparison: both among the 20 largest electricity users.
Open this comparison in the interactive tool to add more countries or change the metric.
Key Facts
- Coal supplied 70.9% of India's electricity in 2025, against 2.1% in Brazil.
- India's electricity was 6.1 times as carbon intensive as Brazil's in 2025, at 671 gCO2/kWh against 109 gCO2/kWh.
- The average person in Brazil used 3.58 MWh of electricity in 2025, 2.5 times as much as in India (1.42 MWh).
- Low carbon sources supplied 88.9% of Brazil's electricity in 2025 and 26.6% of India's.
- Electricity demand in 2025 was 775 TWh in Brazil and 2,081 TWh in India.
Key Figures, 2025
Ember annual statistics| Measure | Brazil | India |
|---|---|---|
| Total generation | 764 TWh | 2,080 TWh |
| Electricity demand | 775 TWh | 2,081 TWh |
| Demand per person | 3.58 MWh | 1.42 MWh |
| Carbon intensity | 109 gCO2/kWh | 671 gCO2/kWh |
| Power sector emissions | 83.4 MtCO2 | 1,396 MtCO2 |
| Low carbon share | 88.9% | 26.6% |
| Largest source | Hydro 52.1% | Coal 70.9% |
Generation Mix, 2025
Share of generationCarbon Intensity, 1985 to 2025
Ember annual statistics| Year | Brazil | India |
|---|---|---|
| 1985 | 61 gCO2/kWh | 635 gCO2/kWh |
| 1986 | 85 gCO2/kWh | 652 gCO2/kWh |
| 1987 | 74 gCO2/kWh | 690 gCO2/kWh |
| 1988 | 66 gCO2/kWh | 684 gCO2/kWh |
| 1989 | 66 gCO2/kWh | 686 gCO2/kWh |
| 1990 | 60 gCO2/kWh | 679 gCO2/kWh |
| 1991 | 62 gCO2/kWh | 683 gCO2/kWh |
| 1992 | 63 gCO2/kWh | 700 gCO2/kWh |
| 1993 | 61 gCO2/kWh | 713 gCO2/kWh |
| 1994 | 61 gCO2/kWh | 705 gCO2/kWh |
| 1995 | 63 gCO2/kWh | 723 gCO2/kWh |
| 1996 | 68 gCO2/kWh | 738 gCO2/kWh |
| 1997 | 71 gCO2/kWh | 738 gCO2/kWh |
| 1998 | 71 gCO2/kWh | 720 gCO2/kWh |
| 1999 | 90 gCO2/kWh | 729 gCO2/kWh |
| 2000 | 89 gCO2/kWh | 740 gCO2/kWh |
| 2001 | 106 gCO2/kWh | 747 gCO2/kWh |
| 2002 | 97 gCO2/kWh | 756 gCO2/kWh |
| 2003 | 91 gCO2/kWh | 758 gCO2/kWh |
| 2004 | 102 gCO2/kWh | 724 gCO2/kWh |
| 2005 | 99 gCO2/kWh | 734 gCO2/kWh |
| 2006 | 96 gCO2/kWh | 723 gCO2/kWh |
| 2007 | 91 gCO2/kWh | 718 gCO2/kWh |
| 2008 | 114 gCO2/kWh | 733 gCO2/kWh |
| 2009 | 87 gCO2/kWh | 745 gCO2/kWh |
| 2010 | 114 gCO2/kWh | 739 gCO2/kWh |
| 2011 | 100 gCO2/kWh | 722 gCO2/kWh |
| 2012 | 128 gCO2/kWh | 743 gCO2/kWh |
| 2013 | 168 gCO2/kWh | 739 gCO2/kWh |
| 2014 | 193 gCO2/kWh | 743 gCO2/kWh |
| 2015 | 189 gCO2/kWh | 751 gCO2/kWh |
| 2016 | 150 gCO2/kWh | 752 gCO2/kWh |
| 2017 | 156 gCO2/kWh | 743 gCO2/kWh |
| 2018 | 137 gCO2/kWh | 738 gCO2/kWh |
| 2019 | 142 gCO2/kWh | 723 gCO2/kWh |
| 2020 | 133 gCO2/kWh | 710 gCO2/kWh |
| 2021 | 168 gCO2/kWh | 716 gCO2/kWh |
| 2022 | 103 gCO2/kWh | 707 gCO2/kWh |
| 2023 | 96 gCO2/kWh | 714 gCO2/kWh |
| 2024 | 106 gCO2/kWh | 707 gCO2/kWh |
| 2025 | 109 gCO2/kWh | 671 gCO2/kWh |
Demand per Person, 1985 to 2025
Ember annual statistics| Year | Brazil | India |
|---|---|---|
| 1985 | n/a | n/a |
| 1986 | n/a | n/a |
| 1987 | n/a | n/a |
| 1988 | n/a | n/a |
| 1989 | n/a | n/a |
| 1990 | n/a | n/a |
| 1991 | n/a | n/a |
| 1992 | n/a | n/a |
| 1993 | n/a | n/a |
| 1994 | n/a | n/a |
| 1995 | n/a | n/a |
| 1996 | n/a | n/a |
| 1997 | n/a | n/a |
| 1998 | n/a | n/a |
| 1999 | n/a | n/a |
| 2000 | 2.25 MWh | 0.54 MWh |
| 2001 | 2.08 MWh | 0.55 MWh |
| 2002 | 2.14 MWh | 0.56 MWh |
| 2003 | 2.23 MWh | 0.57 MWh |
| 2004 | 2.33 MWh | 0.62 MWh |
| 2005 | 2.39 MWh | 0.61 MWh |
| 2006 | 2.47 MWh | 0.64 MWh |
| 2007 | 2.57 MWh | 0.67 MWh |
| 2008 | 2.66 MWh | 0.69 MWh |
| 2009 | 2.64 MWh | 0.72 MWh |
| 2010 | 2.84 MWh | 0.76 MWh |
| 2011 | 2.91 MWh | 0.82 MWh |
| 2012 | 3.01 MWh | 0.86 MWh |
| 2013 | 3.08 MWh | 0.88 MWh |
| 2014 | 3.12 MWh | 0.96 MWh |
| 2015 | 3.05 MWh | 0.99 MWh |
| 2016 | 3.05 MWh | 1.04 MWh |
| 2017 | 3.06 MWh | 1.07 MWh |
| 2018 | 3.09 MWh | 1.14 MWh |
| 2019 | 3.17 MWh | 1.15 MWh |
| 2020 | 3.13 MWh | 1.12 MWh |
| 2021 | 3.24 MWh | 1.19 MWh |
| 2022 | 3.28 MWh | 1.27 MWh |
| 2023 | 3.43 MWh | 1.33 MWh |
| 2024 | 3.57 MWh | 1.40 MWh |
| 2025 | 3.58 MWh | 1.42 MWh |
Brazil history · India history
Source: Ember (ember-energy.org), licensed under CC BY 4.0. Data as of 2025.
Related
Cite this page
World Power Monitor. (2025). Brazil vs India: Electricity Compared. https://worldpowermonitor.com/compare/brazil-vs-india/
World Power Monitor. Brazil vs India: Electricity Compared. Data as of 2025. Data from Ember. https://worldpowermonitor.com/compare/brazil-vs-india/
@misc{wpm_compare_brazil_vs_india_2025,
title = {{Brazil vs India: Electricity Compared}},
author = {{World Power Monitor}},
year = {2025},
note = {Data as of 2025. Data from Ember.},
url = {https://worldpowermonitor.com/compare/brazil-vs-india/}
} Permalink: https://worldpowermonitor.com/compare/brazil-vs-india/
The Copy buttons add today's date as the access date.