Brazil vs Japan: Electricity Compared
Brazil generated 764 TWh of electricity in 2025 and Japan 1,027 TWh, according to Ember. Brazil's largest source was hydro (52.1%); Japan's was gas (32.7%). Each kWh generated emitted 109 gCO2/kWh in Brazil and 474 gCO2/kWh in Japan. These are Ember annual statistics for 2025, compiled from national sources; they are not real time.
Who is bigger and who is cleaner? Japan is the bigger electricity producer, generating 1.3 times as much as Brazil in 2025 (1,027 TWh against 764 TWh). Brazil has the cleaner electricity by carbon intensity, at 109 gCO2/kWh against 474 gCO2/kWh in Japan in 2025.
Why this comparison: both among the 20 largest electricity users.
Open this comparison in the interactive tool to add more countries or change the metric.
Key Facts
- Hydro supplied 52.1% of Brazil's electricity in 2025, against 7.2% in Japan.
- Japan's electricity was 4.3 times as carbon intensive as Brazil's in 2025, at 474 gCO2/kWh against 109 gCO2/kWh.
- The average person in Japan used 8.37 MWh of electricity in 2025, 2.3 times as much as in Brazil (3.58 MWh).
- Low carbon sources supplied 88.9% of Brazil's electricity in 2025 and 33.1% of Japan's.
- Electricity demand in 2025 was 775 TWh in Brazil and 1,027 TWh in Japan.
Key Figures, 2025
Ember annual statistics| Measure | Brazil | Japan |
|---|---|---|
| Total generation | 764 TWh | 1,027 TWh |
| Electricity demand | 775 TWh | 1,027 TWh |
| Demand per person | 3.58 MWh | 8.37 MWh |
| Carbon intensity | 109 gCO2/kWh | 474 gCO2/kWh |
| Power sector emissions | 83.4 MtCO2 | 487 MtCO2 |
| Low carbon share | 88.9% | 33.1% |
| Largest source | Hydro 52.1% | Gas 32.7% |
Generation Mix, 2025
Share of generationCarbon Intensity, 1985 to 2025
Ember annual statistics| Year | Brazil | Japan |
|---|---|---|
| 1985 | 61 gCO2/kWh | 421 gCO2/kWh |
| 1986 | 85 gCO2/kWh | 417 gCO2/kWh |
| 1987 | 74 gCO2/kWh | 417 gCO2/kWh |
| 1988 | 66 gCO2/kWh | 427 gCO2/kWh |
| 1989 | 66 gCO2/kWh | 429 gCO2/kWh |
| 1990 | 60 gCO2/kWh | 447 gCO2/kWh |
| 1991 | 62 gCO2/kWh | 438 gCO2/kWh |
| 1992 | 63 gCO2/kWh | 445 gCO2/kWh |
| 1993 | 61 gCO2/kWh | 419 gCO2/kWh |
| 1994 | 61 gCO2/kWh | 444 gCO2/kWh |
| 1995 | 63 gCO2/kWh | 424 gCO2/kWh |
| 1996 | 68 gCO2/kWh | 423 gCO2/kWh |
| 1997 | 71 gCO2/kWh | 408 gCO2/kWh |
| 1998 | 71 gCO2/kWh | 404 gCO2/kWh |
| 1999 | 90 gCO2/kWh | 419 gCO2/kWh |
| 2000 | 89 gCO2/kWh | 424 gCO2/kWh |
| 2001 | 106 gCO2/kWh | 424 gCO2/kWh |
| 2002 | 97 gCO2/kWh | 434 gCO2/kWh |
| 2003 | 91 gCO2/kWh | 476 gCO2/kWh |
| 2004 | 102 gCO2/kWh | 450 gCO2/kWh |
| 2005 | 99 gCO2/kWh | 462 gCO2/kWh |
| 2006 | 96 gCO2/kWh | 447 gCO2/kWh |
| 2007 | 91 gCO2/kWh | 470 gCO2/kWh |
| 2008 | 114 gCO2/kWh | 485 gCO2/kWh |
| 2009 | 87 gCO2/kWh | 460 gCO2/kWh |
| 2010 | 114 gCO2/kWh | 447 gCO2/kWh |
| 2011 | 100 gCO2/kWh | 505 gCO2/kWh |
| 2012 | 128 gCO2/kWh | 595 gCO2/kWh |
| 2013 | 168 gCO2/kWh | 596 gCO2/kWh |
| 2014 | 193 gCO2/kWh | 592 gCO2/kWh |
| 2015 | 189 gCO2/kWh | 578 gCO2/kWh |
| 2016 | 150 gCO2/kWh | 567 gCO2/kWh |
| 2017 | 156 gCO2/kWh | 558 gCO2/kWh |
| 2018 | 137 gCO2/kWh | 542 gCO2/kWh |
| 2019 | 142 gCO2/kWh | 529 gCO2/kWh |
| 2020 | 133 gCO2/kWh | 528 gCO2/kWh |
| 2021 | 168 gCO2/kWh | 515 gCO2/kWh |
| 2022 | 103 gCO2/kWh | 520 gCO2/kWh |
| 2023 | 96 gCO2/kWh | 493 gCO2/kWh |
| 2024 | 106 gCO2/kWh | 484 gCO2/kWh |
| 2025 | 109 gCO2/kWh | 474 gCO2/kWh |
Demand per Person, 1985 to 2025
Ember annual statistics| Year | Brazil | Japan |
|---|---|---|
| 1985 | n/a | n/a |
| 1986 | n/a | n/a |
| 1987 | n/a | n/a |
| 1988 | n/a | n/a |
| 1989 | n/a | n/a |
| 1990 | n/a | n/a |
| 1991 | n/a | n/a |
| 1992 | n/a | n/a |
| 1993 | n/a | n/a |
| 1994 | n/a | n/a |
| 1995 | n/a | n/a |
| 1996 | n/a | n/a |
| 1997 | n/a | n/a |
| 1998 | n/a | n/a |
| 1999 | n/a | n/a |
| 2000 | 2.25 MWh | 8.66 MWh |
| 2001 | 2.08 MWh | 8.51 MWh |
| 2002 | 2.14 MWh | 8.65 MWh |
| 2003 | 2.23 MWh | 8.56 MWh |
| 2004 | 2.33 MWh | 8.77 MWh |
| 2005 | 2.39 MWh | 9.01 MWh |
| 2006 | 2.47 MWh | 9.10 MWh |
| 2007 | 2.57 MWh | 9.21 MWh |
| 2008 | 2.66 MWh | 9.24 MWh |
| 2009 | 2.64 MWh | 8.69 MWh |
| 2010 | 2.84 MWh | 9.02 MWh |
| 2011 | 2.91 MWh | 8.62 MWh |
| 2012 | 3.01 MWh | 8.65 MWh |
| 2013 | 3.08 MWh | 8.52 MWh |
| 2014 | 3.12 MWh | 8.34 MWh |
| 2015 | 3.05 MWh | 8.09 MWh |
| 2016 | 3.05 MWh | 8.37 MWh |
| 2017 | 3.06 MWh | 8.48 MWh |
| 2018 | 3.09 MWh | 8.53 MWh |
| 2019 | 3.17 MWh | 8.27 MWh |
| 2020 | 3.13 MWh | 8.01 MWh |
| 2021 | 3.24 MWh | 8.23 MWh |
| 2022 | 3.28 MWh | 8.33 MWh |
| 2023 | 3.43 MWh | 8.10 MWh |
| 2024 | 3.57 MWh | 8.21 MWh |
| 2025 | 3.58 MWh | 8.37 MWh |
Brazil history · Japan history
Source: Ember (ember-energy.org), licensed under CC BY 4.0. Data as of 2025.
Related
Cite this page
World Power Monitor. (2025). Brazil vs Japan: Electricity Compared. https://worldpowermonitor.com/compare/brazil-vs-japan/
World Power Monitor. Brazil vs Japan: Electricity Compared. Data as of 2025. Data from Ember. https://worldpowermonitor.com/compare/brazil-vs-japan/
@misc{wpm_compare_brazil_vs_japan_2025,
title = {{Brazil vs Japan: Electricity Compared}},
author = {{World Power Monitor}},
year = {2025},
note = {Data as of 2025. Data from Ember.},
url = {https://worldpowermonitor.com/compare/brazil-vs-japan/}
} Permalink: https://worldpowermonitor.com/compare/brazil-vs-japan/
The Copy buttons add today's date as the access date.