Brazil vs Peru: Electricity Compared
Brazil generated 764 TWh of electricity in 2025 and Peru 60.5 TWh, according to Ember. Hydro was the largest source in both, at 52.1% in Brazil and 56.0% in Peru. Each kWh generated emitted 109 gCO2/kWh in Brazil and 238 gCO2/kWh in Peru. These are Ember annual statistics for 2025, compiled from national sources; they are not real time.
Who is bigger and who is cleaner? Brazil is the bigger electricity producer, generating 12.6 times as much as Peru in 2025 (764 TWh against 60.5 TWh). Brazil has the cleaner electricity by carbon intensity, at 109 gCO2/kWh against 238 gCO2/kWh in Peru in 2025.
Why this comparison: neighbours by land border or interconnector.
Open this comparison in the interactive tool to add more countries or change the metric.
Key Facts
- Gas supplied 36.1% of Peru's electricity in 2025, against 7.8% in Brazil.
- Peru's electricity was 2.2 times as carbon intensive as Brazil's in 2025, at 238 gCO2/kWh against 109 gCO2/kWh.
- The average person in Brazil used 3.58 MWh of electricity in 2025, 2.0 times as much as in Peru (1.75 MWh).
- Low carbon sources supplied 88.9% of Brazil's electricity in 2025 and 63.7% of Peru's.
- Electricity demand in 2025 was 775 TWh in Brazil and 60.5 TWh in Peru.
Key Figures, 2025
Ember annual statistics| Measure | Brazil | Peru |
|---|---|---|
| Total generation | 764 TWh | 60.5 TWh |
| Electricity demand | 775 TWh | 60.5 TWh |
| Demand per person | 3.58 MWh | 1.75 MWh |
| Carbon intensity | 109 gCO2/kWh | 238 gCO2/kWh |
| Power sector emissions | 83.4 MtCO2 | 14.4 MtCO2 |
| Low carbon share | 88.9% | 63.7% |
| Largest source | Hydro 52.1% | Hydro 56.0% |
Generation Mix, 2025
Share of generationCarbon Intensity, 1985 to 2025
Ember annual statistics| Year | Brazil | Peru |
|---|---|---|
| 1985 | 61 gCO2/kWh | n/a |
| 1986 | 85 gCO2/kWh | n/a |
| 1987 | 74 gCO2/kWh | n/a |
| 1988 | 66 gCO2/kWh | n/a |
| 1989 | 66 gCO2/kWh | n/a |
| 1990 | 60 gCO2/kWh | n/a |
| 1991 | 62 gCO2/kWh | n/a |
| 1992 | 63 gCO2/kWh | n/a |
| 1993 | 61 gCO2/kWh | n/a |
| 1994 | 61 gCO2/kWh | n/a |
| 1995 | 63 gCO2/kWh | n/a |
| 1996 | 68 gCO2/kWh | n/a |
| 1997 | 71 gCO2/kWh | n/a |
| 1998 | 71 gCO2/kWh | n/a |
| 1999 | 90 gCO2/kWh | n/a |
| 2000 | 89 gCO2/kWh | 141 gCO2/kWh |
| 2001 | 106 gCO2/kWh | 118 gCO2/kWh |
| 2002 | 97 gCO2/kWh | 139 gCO2/kWh |
| 2003 | 91 gCO2/kWh | 146 gCO2/kWh |
| 2004 | 102 gCO2/kWh | 200 gCO2/kWh |
| 2005 | 99 gCO2/kWh | 200 gCO2/kWh |
| 2006 | 96 gCO2/kWh | 193 gCO2/kWh |
| 2007 | 91 gCO2/kWh | 230 gCO2/kWh |
| 2008 | 114 gCO2/kWh | 269 gCO2/kWh |
| 2009 | 87 gCO2/kWh | 265 gCO2/kWh |
| 2010 | 114 gCO2/kWh | 283 gCO2/kWh |
| 2011 | 100 gCO2/kWh | 286 gCO2/kWh |
| 2012 | 128 gCO2/kWh | 298 gCO2/kWh |
| 2013 | 168 gCO2/kWh | 305 gCO2/kWh |
| 2014 | 193 gCO2/kWh | 309 gCO2/kWh |
| 2015 | 189 gCO2/kWh | 306 gCO2/kWh |
| 2016 | 150 gCO2/kWh | 321 gCO2/kWh |
| 2017 | 156 gCO2/kWh | 272 gCO2/kWh |
| 2018 | 137 gCO2/kWh | 253 gCO2/kWh |
| 2019 | 142 gCO2/kWh | 257 gCO2/kWh |
| 2020 | 133 gCO2/kWh | 240 gCO2/kWh |
| 2021 | 168 gCO2/kWh | 251 gCO2/kWh |
| 2022 | 103 gCO2/kWh | 288 gCO2/kWh |
| 2023 | 96 gCO2/kWh | 292 gCO2/kWh |
| 2024 | 106 gCO2/kWh | 258 gCO2/kWh |
| 2025 | 109 gCO2/kWh | 238 gCO2/kWh |
Demand per Person, 1985 to 2025
Ember annual statistics| Year | Brazil | Peru |
|---|---|---|
| 1985 | n/a | n/a |
| 1986 | n/a | n/a |
| 1987 | n/a | n/a |
| 1988 | n/a | n/a |
| 1989 | n/a | n/a |
| 1990 | n/a | n/a |
| 1991 | n/a | n/a |
| 1992 | n/a | n/a |
| 1993 | n/a | n/a |
| 1994 | n/a | n/a |
| 1995 | n/a | n/a |
| 1996 | n/a | n/a |
| 1997 | n/a | n/a |
| 1998 | n/a | n/a |
| 1999 | n/a | n/a |
| 2000 | 2.25 MWh | 0.75 MWh |
| 2001 | 2.08 MWh | 0.77 MWh |
| 2002 | 2.14 MWh | 0.81 MWh |
| 2003 | 2.23 MWh | 0.83 MWh |
| 2004 | 2.33 MWh | 0.87 MWh |
| 2005 | 2.39 MWh | 0.91 MWh |
| 2006 | 2.47 MWh | 0.97 MWh |
| 2007 | 2.57 MWh | 1.05 MWh |
| 2008 | 2.66 MWh | 1.13 MWh |
| 2009 | 2.64 MWh | 1.14 MWh |
| 2010 | 2.84 MWh | 1.23 MWh |
| 2011 | 2.91 MWh | 1.34 MWh |
| 2012 | 3.01 MWh | 1.35 MWh |
| 2013 | 3.08 MWh | 1.46 MWh |
| 2014 | 3.12 MWh | 1.52 MWh |
| 2015 | 3.05 MWh | 1.58 MWh |
| 2016 | 3.05 MWh | 1.67 MWh |
| 2017 | 3.06 MWh | 1.68 MWh |
| 2018 | 3.09 MWh | 1.71 MWh |
| 2019 | 3.17 MWh | 1.75 MWh |
| 2020 | 3.13 MWh | 1.62 MWh |
| 2021 | 3.24 MWh | 1.72 MWh |
| 2022 | 3.28 MWh | 1.79 MWh |
| 2023 | 3.43 MWh | 1.80 MWh |
| 2024 | 3.57 MWh | 1.73 MWh |
| 2025 | 3.58 MWh | 1.75 MWh |
Source: Ember (ember-energy.org), licensed under CC BY 4.0. Data as of 2025.
Related
Cite this page
World Power Monitor. (2025). Brazil vs Peru: Electricity Compared. https://worldpowermonitor.com/compare/brazil-vs-peru/
World Power Monitor. Brazil vs Peru: Electricity Compared. Data as of 2025. Data from Ember. https://worldpowermonitor.com/compare/brazil-vs-peru/
@misc{wpm_compare_brazil_vs_peru_2025,
title = {{Brazil vs Peru: Electricity Compared}},
author = {{World Power Monitor}},
year = {2025},
note = {Data as of 2025. Data from Ember.},
url = {https://worldpowermonitor.com/compare/brazil-vs-peru/}
} Permalink: https://worldpowermonitor.com/compare/brazil-vs-peru/
The Copy buttons add today's date as the access date.