Austria vs Finland: Electricity Compared
Austria generated 73.2 TWh of electricity in 2025 and Finland 82.5 TWh, according to Ember. Austria's largest source was hydro (51.9%); Finland's was nuclear (39.8%). Each kWh generated emitted 117 gCO2/kWh in Austria and 59 gCO2/kWh in Finland. These are Ember annual statistics for 2025, compiled from national sources; they are not real time.
Who is bigger and who is cleaner? Finland is the bigger electricity producer, generating 1.1 times as much as Austria in 2025 (82.5 TWh against 73.2 TWh). Finland has the cleaner electricity by carbon intensity, at 59 gCO2/kWh against 117 gCO2/kWh in Austria in 2025.
Why this comparison: similar electricity demand on the same continent.
Open this comparison in the interactive tool to add more countries or change the metric.
Key Facts
- Nuclear supplied 39.8% of Finland's electricity in 2025, against none in Austria.
- Austria's electricity was 2.0 times as carbon intensive as Finland's in 2025, at 117 gCO2/kWh against 59 gCO2/kWh.
- Low carbon sources supplied 83.7% of Austria's electricity in 2025 and 96.2% of Finland's.
- Electricity demand in 2025 was 77.4 TWh in Austria and 88.0 TWh in Finland.
Key Figures, 2025
Ember annual statistics| Measure | Austria | Finland |
|---|---|---|
| Total generation | 73.2 TWh | 82.5 TWh |
| Electricity demand | 77.4 TWh | 88.0 TWh |
| Demand per person | 8.49 MWh | 15.62 MWh |
| Carbon intensity | 117 gCO2/kWh | 59 gCO2/kWh |
| Power sector emissions | 8.54 MtCO2 | 4.85 MtCO2 |
| Low carbon share | 83.7% | 96.2% |
| Largest source | Hydro 51.9% | Nuclear 39.8% |
Generation Mix, 2025
Share of generation| Source | Austria | Finland |
|---|---|---|
| Hydro | 51.9% | 15.1% |
| Nuclear | 0.0% | 39.8% |
| Wind | 11.4% | 27.4% |
| Solar | 14.1% | 1.2% |
| Bioenergy | 6.3% | 12.5% |
| Gas | 11.9% | 1.1% |
| Other fossil | 4.5% | 2.3% |
| Coal | 0.0% | 0.4% |
| Other renewables | 0.0% | 0.2% |
Carbon Intensity, 1990 to 2025
Ember annual statistics| Year | Austria | Finland |
|---|---|---|
| 1990 | 250 gCO2/kWh | 282 gCO2/kWh |
| 1991 | 263 gCO2/kWh | 276 gCO2/kWh |
| 1992 | 202 gCO2/kWh | 245 gCO2/kWh |
| 1993 | 184 gCO2/kWh | 278 gCO2/kWh |
| 1994 | 196 gCO2/kWh | 337 gCO2/kWh |
| 1995 | 207 gCO2/kWh | 304 gCO2/kWh |
| 1996 | 233 gCO2/kWh | 351 gCO2/kWh |
| 1997 | 233 gCO2/kWh | 319 gCO2/kWh |
| 1998 | 211 gCO2/kWh | 250 gCO2/kWh |
| 1999 | 204 gCO2/kWh | 263 gCO2/kWh |
| 2000 | 203 gCO2/kWh | 247 gCO2/kWh |
| 2001 | 229 gCO2/kWh | 285 gCO2/kWh |
| 2002 | 226 gCO2/kWh | 316 gCO2/kWh |
| 2003 | 282 gCO2/kWh | 371 gCO2/kWh |
| 2004 | 259 gCO2/kWh | 325 gCO2/kWh |
| 2005 | 254 gCO2/kWh | 231 gCO2/kWh |
| 2006 | 253 gCO2/kWh | 336 gCO2/kWh |
| 2007 | 233 gCO2/kWh | 309 gCO2/kWh |
| 2008 | 221 gCO2/kWh | 246 gCO2/kWh |
| 2009 | 196 gCO2/kWh | 276 gCO2/kWh |
| 2010 | 227 gCO2/kWh | 315 gCO2/kWh |
| 2011 | 239 gCO2/kWh | 268 gCO2/kWh |
| 2012 | 186 gCO2/kWh | 215 gCO2/kWh |
| 2013 | 173 gCO2/kWh | 257 gCO2/kWh |
| 2014 | 151 gCO2/kWh | 227 gCO2/kWh |
| 2015 | 172 gCO2/kWh | 182 gCO2/kWh |
| 2016 | 155 gCO2/kWh | 200 gCO2/kWh |
| 2017 | 163 gCO2/kWh | 186 gCO2/kWh |
| 2018 | 158 gCO2/kWh | 194 gCO2/kWh |
| 2019 | 153 gCO2/kWh | 171 gCO2/kWh |
| 2020 | 133 gCO2/kWh | 130 gCO2/kWh |
| 2021 | 135 gCO2/kWh | 136 gCO2/kWh |
| 2022 | 141 gCO2/kWh | 130 gCO2/kWh |
| 2023 | 112 gCO2/kWh | 81 gCO2/kWh |
| 2024 | 103 gCO2/kWh | 67 gCO2/kWh |
| 2025 | 117 gCO2/kWh | 59 gCO2/kWh |
Demand per Person, 1990 to 2025
Ember annual statistics| Year | Austria | Finland |
|---|---|---|
| 1990 | n/a | n/a |
| 1991 | n/a | n/a |
| 1992 | n/a | n/a |
| 1993 | n/a | n/a |
| 1994 | n/a | n/a |
| 1995 | n/a | n/a |
| 1996 | n/a | n/a |
| 1997 | n/a | n/a |
| 1998 | n/a | n/a |
| 1999 | n/a | n/a |
| 2000 | 7.27 MWh | 15.81 MWh |
| 2001 | 7.61 MWh | 16.27 MWh |
| 2002 | 7.59 MWh | 16.70 MWh |
| 2003 | 7.83 MWh | 17.10 MWh |
| 2004 | 7.94 MWh | 17.35 MWh |
| 2005 | 8.14 MWh | 16.69 MWh |
| 2006 | 8.29 MWh | 17.79 MWh |
| 2007 | 8.30 MWh | 17.72 MWh |
| 2008 | 8.32 MWh | 16.96 MWh |
| 2009 | 8.03 MWh | 15.76 MWh |
| 2010 | 8.40 MWh | 16.99 MWh |
| 2011 | 8.39 MWh | 16.21 MWh |
| 2012 | 8.47 MWh | 16.23 MWh |
| 2013 | 8.47 MWh | 15.99 MWh |
| 2014 | 8.29 MWh | 15.76 MWh |
| 2015 | 8.31 MWh | 15.50 MWh |
| 2016 | 8.24 MWh | 15.96 MWh |
| 2017 | 8.37 MWh | 15.97 MWh |
| 2018 | 8.33 MWh | 16.35 MWh |
| 2019 | 8.31 MWh | 16.06 MWh |
| 2020 | 7.98 MWh | 15.25 MWh |
| 2021 | 8.28 MWh | 16.22 MWh |
| 2022 | 8.07 MWh | 15.21 MWh |
| 2023 | 7.77 MWh | 14.86 MWh |
| 2024 | 7.86 MWh | 15.26 MWh |
| 2025 | 8.49 MWh | 15.62 MWh |
Austria history · Finland history
Source: Ember (ember-energy.org), licensed under CC BY 4.0. Data as of 2025.
Related
Cite this page
World Power Monitor. (2025). Austria vs Finland: Electricity Compared. https://worldpowermonitor.com/compare/austria-vs-finland/
World Power Monitor. Austria vs Finland: Electricity Compared. Data as of 2025. Data from Ember. https://worldpowermonitor.com/compare/austria-vs-finland/
@misc{wpm_compare_austria_vs_finland_2025,
title = {{Austria vs Finland: Electricity Compared}},
author = {{World Power Monitor}},
year = {2025},
note = {Data as of 2025. Data from Ember.},
url = {https://worldpowermonitor.com/compare/austria-vs-finland/}
} Permalink: https://worldpowermonitor.com/compare/austria-vs-finland/
The Copy buttons add today's date as the access date.