Finland vs Sweden: Electricity Compared
Finland generated 82.5 TWh of electricity in 2025 and Sweden 170 TWh, according to Ember. Finland's largest source was nuclear (39.8%); Sweden's was hydro (40.1%). Each kWh generated emitted 59 gCO2/kWh in Finland and 35 gCO2/kWh in Sweden. These are Ember annual statistics for 2025, compiled from national sources; they are not real time.
Who is bigger and who is cleaner? Sweden is the bigger electricity producer, generating 2.1 times as much as Finland in 2025 (170 TWh against 82.5 TWh). Sweden has the cleaner electricity by carbon intensity, at 35 gCO2/kWh against 59 gCO2/kWh in Finland in 2025.
Why this comparison: neighbours by land border or interconnector.
Open this comparison in the interactive tool to add more countries or change the metric.
Key Facts
- Hydro supplied 40.1% of Sweden's electricity in 2025, against 15.1% in Finland.
- Finland's electricity was 1.7 times as carbon intensive as Sweden's in 2025, at 59 gCO2/kWh against 35 gCO2/kWh.
- Low carbon sources supplied 96.2% of Finland's electricity in 2025 and 98.8% of Sweden's.
- Electricity demand in 2025 was 88.0 TWh in Finland and 137 TWh in Sweden.
Key Figures, 2025
Ember annual statistics| Measure | Finland | Sweden |
|---|---|---|
| Total generation | 82.5 TWh | 170 TWh |
| Electricity demand | 88.0 TWh | 137 TWh |
| Demand per person | 15.62 MWh | 12.83 MWh |
| Carbon intensity | 59 gCO2/kWh | 35 gCO2/kWh |
| Power sector emissions | 4.85 MtCO2 | 6.02 MtCO2 |
| Low carbon share | 96.2% | 98.8% |
| Largest source | Nuclear 39.8% | Hydro 40.1% |
Generation Mix, 2025
Share of generation| Source | Finland | Sweden |
|---|---|---|
| Hydro | 15.1% | 40.1% |
| Nuclear | 39.8% | 27.4% |
| Wind | 27.4% | 22.8% |
| Bioenergy | 12.5% | 5.9% |
| Solar | 1.2% | 2.6% |
| Other fossil | 2.3% | 1.2% |
| Gas | 1.1% | 0.1% |
| Coal | 0.4% | 0.0% |
| Other renewables | 0.2% | 0.0% |
Carbon Intensity, 1990 to 2025
Ember annual statistics| Year | Finland | Sweden |
|---|---|---|
| 1990 | 282 gCO2/kWh | 33 gCO2/kWh |
| 1991 | 276 gCO2/kWh | 41 gCO2/kWh |
| 1992 | 245 gCO2/kWh | 46 gCO2/kWh |
| 1993 | 278 gCO2/kWh | 51 gCO2/kWh |
| 1994 | 337 gCO2/kWh | 57 gCO2/kWh |
| 1995 | 304 gCO2/kWh | 54 gCO2/kWh |
| 1996 | 351 gCO2/kWh | 79 gCO2/kWh |
| 1997 | 319 gCO2/kWh | 52 gCO2/kWh |
| 1998 | 250 gCO2/kWh | 49 gCO2/kWh |
| 1999 | 263 gCO2/kWh | 50 gCO2/kWh |
| 2000 | 247 gCO2/kWh | 45 gCO2/kWh |
| 2001 | 285 gCO2/kWh | 47 gCO2/kWh |
| 2002 | 316 gCO2/kWh | 56 gCO2/kWh |
| 2003 | 371 gCO2/kWh | 69 gCO2/kWh |
| 2004 | 325 gCO2/kWh | 48 gCO2/kWh |
| 2005 | 231 gCO2/kWh | 43 gCO2/kWh |
| 2006 | 336 gCO2/kWh | 50 gCO2/kWh |
| 2007 | 309 gCO2/kWh | 46 gCO2/kWh |
| 2008 | 246 gCO2/kWh | 48 gCO2/kWh |
| 2009 | 276 gCO2/kWh | 51 gCO2/kWh |
| 2010 | 315 gCO2/kWh | 64 gCO2/kWh |
| 2011 | 268 gCO2/kWh | 52 gCO2/kWh |
| 2012 | 215 gCO2/kWh | 45 gCO2/kWh |
| 2013 | 257 gCO2/kWh | 45 gCO2/kWh |
| 2014 | 227 gCO2/kWh | 40 gCO2/kWh |
| 2015 | 182 gCO2/kWh | 41 gCO2/kWh |
| 2016 | 200 gCO2/kWh | 43 gCO2/kWh |
| 2017 | 186 gCO2/kWh | 42 gCO2/kWh |
| 2018 | 194 gCO2/kWh | 43 gCO2/kWh |
| 2019 | 171 gCO2/kWh | 42 gCO2/kWh |
| 2020 | 130 gCO2/kWh | 39 gCO2/kWh |
| 2021 | 136 gCO2/kWh | 42 gCO2/kWh |
| 2022 | 130 gCO2/kWh | 41 gCO2/kWh |
| 2023 | 81 gCO2/kWh | 38 gCO2/kWh |
| 2024 | 67 gCO2/kWh | 35 gCO2/kWh |
| 2025 | 59 gCO2/kWh | 35 gCO2/kWh |
Demand per Person, 1990 to 2025
Ember annual statistics| Year | Finland | Sweden |
|---|---|---|
| 1990 | n/a | n/a |
| 1991 | n/a | n/a |
| 1992 | n/a | n/a |
| 1993 | n/a | n/a |
| 1994 | n/a | n/a |
| 1995 | n/a | n/a |
| 1996 | n/a | n/a |
| 1997 | n/a | n/a |
| 1998 | n/a | n/a |
| 1999 | n/a | n/a |
| 2000 | 15.81 MWh | 16.90 MWh |
| 2001 | 16.27 MWh | 17.35 MWh |
| 2002 | 16.70 MWh | 17.04 MWh |
| 2003 | 17.10 MWh | 16.55 MWh |
| 2004 | 17.35 MWh | 16.62 MWh |
| 2005 | 16.69 MWh | 16.72 MWh |
| 2006 | 17.79 MWh | 16.44 MWh |
| 2007 | 17.72 MWh | 16.41 MWh |
| 2008 | 16.96 MWh | 16.05 MWh |
| 2009 | 15.76 MWh | 15.20 MWh |
| 2010 | 16.99 MWh | 16.05 MWh |
| 2011 | 16.21 MWh | 15.14 MWh |
| 2012 | 16.23 MWh | 15.43 MWh |
| 2013 | 15.99 MWh | 14.90 MWh |
| 2014 | 15.76 MWh | 14.23 MWh |
| 2015 | 15.50 MWh | 14.23 MWh |
| 2016 | 15.96 MWh | 14.53 MWh |
| 2017 | 15.97 MWh | 14.44 MWh |
| 2018 | 16.35 MWh | 14.36 MWh |
| 2019 | 16.06 MWh | 13.84 MWh |
| 2020 | 15.25 MWh | 13.40 MWh |
| 2021 | 16.22 MWh | 14.04 MWh |
| 2022 | 15.21 MWh | 13.33 MWh |
| 2023 | 14.86 MWh | 13.04 MWh |
| 2024 | 15.26 MWh | 13.08 MWh |
| 2025 | 15.62 MWh | 12.83 MWh |
Finland history · Sweden history
Source: Ember (ember-energy.org), licensed under CC BY 4.0. Data as of 2025.
Related
Cite this page
World Power Monitor. (2025). Finland vs Sweden: Electricity Compared. https://worldpowermonitor.com/compare/finland-vs-sweden/
World Power Monitor. Finland vs Sweden: Electricity Compared. Data as of 2025. Data from Ember. https://worldpowermonitor.com/compare/finland-vs-sweden/
@misc{wpm_compare_finland_vs_sweden_2025,
title = {{Finland vs Sweden: Electricity Compared}},
author = {{World Power Monitor}},
year = {2025},
note = {Data as of 2025. Data from Ember.},
url = {https://worldpowermonitor.com/compare/finland-vs-sweden/}
} Permalink: https://worldpowermonitor.com/compare/finland-vs-sweden/
The Copy buttons add today's date as the access date.