Belgium vs Finland: Electricity Compared
Belgium generated 72.1 TWh of electricity in 2025 and Finland 82.5 TWh, according to Ember. Nuclear was the largest source in both, at 33.5% in Belgium and 39.8% in Finland. Each kWh generated emitted 151 gCO2/kWh in Belgium and 59 gCO2/kWh in Finland. These are Ember annual statistics for 2025, compiled from national sources; they are not real time.
Who is bigger and who is cleaner? Finland is the bigger electricity producer, generating 1.1 times as much as Belgium in 2025 (82.5 TWh against 72.1 TWh). Finland has the cleaner electricity by carbon intensity, at 59 gCO2/kWh against 151 gCO2/kWh in Belgium in 2025.
Why this comparison: similar electricity demand on the same continent.
Open this comparison in the interactive tool to add more countries or change the metric.
Key Facts
- Gas supplied 20.8% of Belgium's electricity in 2025, against 1.1% in Finland.
- Belgium's electricity was 2.6 times as carbon intensive as Finland's in 2025, at 151 gCO2/kWh against 59 gCO2/kWh.
- The average person in Finland used 15.62 MWh of electricity in 2025, 2.3 times as much as in Belgium (6.83 MWh).
- Low carbon sources supplied 72.1% of Belgium's electricity in 2025 and 96.2% of Finland's.
- Electricity demand in 2025 was 85.5 TWh in Belgium and 88.0 TWh in Finland.
Key Figures, 2025
Ember annual statistics| Measure | Belgium | Finland |
|---|---|---|
| Total generation | 72.1 TWh | 82.5 TWh |
| Electricity demand | 85.5 TWh | 88.0 TWh |
| Demand per person | 6.83 MWh | 15.62 MWh |
| Carbon intensity | 151 gCO2/kWh | 59 gCO2/kWh |
| Power sector emissions | 10.9 MtCO2 | 4.85 MtCO2 |
| Low carbon share | 72.1% | 96.2% |
| Largest source | Nuclear 33.5% | Nuclear 39.8% |
Generation Mix, 2025
Share of generation| Source | Belgium | Finland |
|---|---|---|
| Nuclear | 33.5% | 39.8% |
| Wind | 18.6% | 27.4% |
| Gas | 20.8% | 1.1% |
| Hydro | 0.4% | 15.1% |
| Solar | 14.5% | 1.2% |
| Bioenergy | 5.1% | 12.5% |
| Other fossil | 7.2% | 2.3% |
| Coal | 0.0% | 0.4% |
| Other renewables | 0.0% | 0.2% |
Carbon Intensity, 1990 to 2025
Ember annual statistics| Year | Belgium | Finland |
|---|---|---|
| 1990 | 313 gCO2/kWh | 282 gCO2/kWh |
| 1991 | 311 gCO2/kWh | 276 gCO2/kWh |
| 1992 | 302 gCO2/kWh | 245 gCO2/kWh |
| 1993 | 311 gCO2/kWh | 278 gCO2/kWh |
| 1994 | 326 gCO2/kWh | 337 gCO2/kWh |
| 1995 | 320 gCO2/kWh | 304 gCO2/kWh |
| 1996 | 304 gCO2/kWh | 351 gCO2/kWh |
| 1997 | 273 gCO2/kWh | 319 gCO2/kWh |
| 1998 | 292 gCO2/kWh | 250 gCO2/kWh |
| 1999 | 246 gCO2/kWh | 263 gCO2/kWh |
| 2000 | 270 gCO2/kWh | 247 gCO2/kWh |
| 2001 | 253 gCO2/kWh | 285 gCO2/kWh |
| 2002 | 250 gCO2/kWh | 316 gCO2/kWh |
| 2003 | 249 gCO2/kWh | 371 gCO2/kWh |
| 2004 | 248 gCO2/kWh | 325 gCO2/kWh |
| 2005 | 241 gCO2/kWh | 231 gCO2/kWh |
| 2006 | 232 gCO2/kWh | 336 gCO2/kWh |
| 2007 | 224 gCO2/kWh | 309 gCO2/kWh |
| 2008 | 218 gCO2/kWh | 246 gCO2/kWh |
| 2009 | 217 gCO2/kWh | 276 gCO2/kWh |
| 2010 | 213 gCO2/kWh | 315 gCO2/kWh |
| 2011 | 193 gCO2/kWh | 268 gCO2/kWh |
| 2012 | 203 gCO2/kWh | 215 gCO2/kWh |
| 2013 | 184 gCO2/kWh | 257 gCO2/kWh |
| 2014 | 190 gCO2/kWh | 227 gCO2/kWh |
| 2015 | 215 gCO2/kWh | 182 gCO2/kWh |
| 2016 | 159 gCO2/kWh | 200 gCO2/kWh |
| 2017 | 160 gCO2/kWh | 186 gCO2/kWh |
| 2018 | 187 gCO2/kWh | 194 gCO2/kWh |
| 2019 | 157 gCO2/kWh | 171 gCO2/kWh |
| 2020 | 167 gCO2/kWh | 130 gCO2/kWh |
| 2021 | 132 gCO2/kWh | 136 gCO2/kWh |
| 2022 | 139 gCO2/kWh | 130 gCO2/kWh |
| 2023 | 135 gCO2/kWh | 81 gCO2/kWh |
| 2024 | 127 gCO2/kWh | 67 gCO2/kWh |
| 2025 | 151 gCO2/kWh | 59 gCO2/kWh |
Demand per Person, 1990 to 2025
Ember annual statistics| Year | Belgium | Finland |
|---|---|---|
| 1990 | n/a | n/a |
| 1991 | n/a | n/a |
| 1992 | n/a | n/a |
| 1993 | n/a | n/a |
| 1994 | n/a | n/a |
| 1995 | n/a | n/a |
| 1996 | n/a | n/a |
| 1997 | n/a | n/a |
| 1998 | n/a | n/a |
| 1999 | n/a | n/a |
| 2000 | 8.50 MWh | 15.81 MWh |
| 2001 | 8.53 MWh | 16.27 MWh |
| 2002 | 8.57 MWh | 16.70 MWh |
| 2003 | 8.67 MWh | 17.10 MWh |
| 2004 | 8.70 MWh | 17.35 MWh |
| 2005 | 8.65 MWh | 16.69 MWh |
| 2006 | 8.86 MWh | 17.79 MWh |
| 2007 | 8.81 MWh | 17.72 MWh |
| 2008 | 8.75 MWh | 16.96 MWh |
| 2009 | 8.13 MWh | 15.76 MWh |
| 2010 | 8.56 MWh | 16.99 MWh |
| 2011 | 8.32 MWh | 16.21 MWh |
| 2012 | 8.23 MWh | 16.23 MWh |
| 2013 | 8.21 MWh | 15.99 MWh |
| 2014 | 7.92 MWh | 15.76 MWh |
| 2015 | 7.93 MWh | 15.50 MWh |
| 2016 | 7.99 MWh | 15.96 MWh |
| 2017 | 8.03 MWh | 15.97 MWh |
| 2018 | 7.98 MWh | 16.35 MWh |
| 2019 | 7.91 MWh | 16.06 MWh |
| 2020 | 7.62 MWh | 15.25 MWh |
| 2021 | 7.91 MWh | 16.22 MWh |
| 2022 | 7.46 MWh | 15.21 MWh |
| 2023 | 7.15 MWh | 14.86 MWh |
| 2024 | 7.34 MWh | 15.26 MWh |
| 2025 | 6.83 MWh | 15.62 MWh |
Belgium history · Finland history
Source: Ember (ember-energy.org), licensed under CC BY 4.0. Data as of 2025.
Related
Cite this page
World Power Monitor. (2025). Belgium vs Finland: Electricity Compared. https://worldpowermonitor.com/compare/belgium-vs-finland/
World Power Monitor. Belgium vs Finland: Electricity Compared. Data as of 2025. Data from Ember. https://worldpowermonitor.com/compare/belgium-vs-finland/
@misc{wpm_compare_belgium_vs_finland_2025,
title = {{Belgium vs Finland: Electricity Compared}},
author = {{World Power Monitor}},
year = {2025},
note = {Data as of 2025. Data from Ember.},
url = {https://worldpowermonitor.com/compare/belgium-vs-finland/}
} Permalink: https://worldpowermonitor.com/compare/belgium-vs-finland/
The Copy buttons add today's date as the access date.