Finland vs Ukraine: Electricity Compared
Finland generated 72.2 TWh of electricity in 2022 and Ukraine 112 TWh, according to Ember. Nuclear was the largest source in both, at 35.1% in Finland and 55.8% in Ukraine. Each kWh generated emitted 130 gCO2/kWh in Finland and 251 gCO2/kWh in Ukraine. These are Ember annual statistics for 2022, compiled from national sources; they are not real time.
Who is bigger and who is cleaner? Ukraine is the bigger electricity producer, generating 1.5 times as much as Finland in 2022 (112 TWh against 72.2 TWh). Finland has the cleaner electricity by carbon intensity, at 130 gCO2/kWh against 251 gCO2/kWh in Ukraine in 2022.
Ember's latest annual figures for Ukraine are for 2022, while Finland has figures to 2025, so this comparison uses 2022 for both.
Why this comparison: similar electricity demand on the same continent.
Open this comparison in the interactive tool to add more countries or change the metric.
Key Facts
- Nuclear supplied 55.8% of Ukraine's electricity in 2022, against 35.1% in Finland.
- Ukraine's electricity was 1.9 times as carbon intensive as Finland's in 2022, at 251 gCO2/kWh against 130 gCO2/kWh.
- The average person in Finland used 15.21 MWh of electricity in 2022, 5.6 times as much as in Ukraine (2.72 MWh).
- Low carbon sources supplied 88.7% of Finland's electricity in 2022 and 72.2% of Ukraine's.
- Electricity demand in 2022 was 84.7 TWh in Finland and 112 TWh in Ukraine.
Key Figures, 2022
Ember annual statistics| Measure | Finland | Ukraine |
|---|---|---|
| Total generation | 72.2 TWh | 112 TWh |
| Electricity demand | 84.7 TWh | 112 TWh |
| Demand per person | 15.21 MWh | 2.72 MWh |
| Carbon intensity | 130 gCO2/kWh | 251 gCO2/kWh |
| Power sector emissions | 9.38 MtCO2 | 27.9 MtCO2 |
| Low carbon share | 88.7% | 72.2% |
| Largest source | Nuclear 35.1% | Nuclear 55.8% |
Generation Mix, 2022
Share of generationCarbon Intensity, 1985 to 2025
Ember annual statistics| Year | Finland | Ukraine |
|---|---|---|
| 1985 | n/a | 617 gCO2/kWh |
| 1986 | n/a | 649 gCO2/kWh |
| 1987 | n/a | 635 gCO2/kWh |
| 1988 | n/a | 579 gCO2/kWh |
| 1989 | n/a | 598 gCO2/kWh |
| 1990 | 282 gCO2/kWh | 576 gCO2/kWh |
| 1991 | 276 gCO2/kWh | 561 gCO2/kWh |
| 1992 | 245 gCO2/kWh | 565 gCO2/kWh |
| 1993 | 278 gCO2/kWh | 520 gCO2/kWh |
| 1994 | 337 gCO2/kWh | 505 gCO2/kWh |
| 1995 | 304 gCO2/kWh | 490 gCO2/kWh |
| 1996 | 351 gCO2/kWh | 429 gCO2/kWh |
| 1997 | 319 gCO2/kWh | 417 gCO2/kWh |
| 1998 | 250 gCO2/kWh | 395 gCO2/kWh |
| 1999 | 263 gCO2/kWh | 416 gCO2/kWh |
| 2000 | 247 gCO2/kWh | 403 gCO2/kWh |
| 2001 | 285 gCO2/kWh | 409 gCO2/kWh |
| 2002 | 316 gCO2/kWh | 414 gCO2/kWh |
| 2003 | 371 gCO2/kWh | 411 gCO2/kWh |
| 2004 | 325 gCO2/kWh | 368 gCO2/kWh |
| 2005 | 231 gCO2/kWh | 375 gCO2/kWh |
| 2006 | 336 gCO2/kWh | 404 gCO2/kWh |
| 2007 | 309 gCO2/kWh | 416 gCO2/kWh |
| 2008 | 246 gCO2/kWh | 418 gCO2/kWh |
| 2009 | 276 gCO2/kWh | 410 gCO2/kWh |
| 2010 | 315 gCO2/kWh | 410 gCO2/kWh |
| 2011 | 268 gCO2/kWh | 428 gCO2/kWh |
| 2012 | 215 gCO2/kWh | 442 gCO2/kWh |
| 2013 | 257 gCO2/kWh | 449 gCO2/kWh |
| 2014 | 227 gCO2/kWh | 418 gCO2/kWh |
| 2015 | 182 gCO2/kWh | 380 gCO2/kWh |
| 2016 | 200 gCO2/kWh | 409 gCO2/kWh |
| 2017 | 186 gCO2/kWh | 347 gCO2/kWh |
| 2018 | 194 gCO2/kWh | 349 gCO2/kWh |
| 2019 | 171 gCO2/kWh | 342 gCO2/kWh |
| 2020 | 130 gCO2/kWh | 325 gCO2/kWh |
| 2021 | 136 gCO2/kWh | 279 gCO2/kWh |
| 2022 | 130 gCO2/kWh | 251 gCO2/kWh |
| 2023 | 81 gCO2/kWh | n/a |
| 2024 | 67 gCO2/kWh | n/a |
| 2025 | 59 gCO2/kWh | n/a |
Demand per Person, 1985 to 2025
Ember annual statistics| Year | Finland | Ukraine |
|---|---|---|
| 1985 | n/a | n/a |
| 1986 | n/a | n/a |
| 1987 | n/a | n/a |
| 1988 | n/a | n/a |
| 1989 | n/a | n/a |
| 1990 | n/a | n/a |
| 1991 | n/a | n/a |
| 1992 | n/a | n/a |
| 1993 | n/a | n/a |
| 1994 | n/a | n/a |
| 1995 | n/a | n/a |
| 1996 | n/a | n/a |
| 1997 | n/a | n/a |
| 1998 | n/a | n/a |
| 1999 | n/a | n/a |
| 2000 | 15.81 MWh | 3.39 MWh |
| 2001 | 16.27 MWh | 3.47 MWh |
| 2002 | 16.70 MWh | 3.51 MWh |
| 2003 | 17.10 MWh | 3.64 MWh |
| 2004 | 17.35 MWh | 3.69 MWh |
| 2005 | 16.69 MWh | 3.74 MWh |
| 2006 | 17.79 MWh | 3.87 MWh |
| 2007 | 17.72 MWh | 3.98 MWh |
| 2008 | 16.96 MWh | 3.97 MWh |
| 2009 | 15.76 MWh | 3.63 MWh |
| 2010 | 16.99 MWh | 3.98 MWh |
| 2011 | 16.21 MWh | 4.07 MWh |
| 2012 | 16.23 MWh | 4.06 MWh |
| 2013 | 15.99 MWh | 4.00 MWh |
| 2014 | 15.76 MWh | 3.79 MWh |
| 2015 | 15.50 MWh | 3.55 MWh |
| 2016 | 15.96 MWh | 3.53 MWh |
| 2017 | 15.97 MWh | 3.32 MWh |
| 2018 | 16.35 MWh | 3.40 MWh |
| 2019 | 16.06 MWh | 3.34 MWh |
| 2020 | 15.25 MWh | 3.25 MWh |
| 2021 | 16.22 MWh | 3.49 MWh |
| 2022 | 15.21 MWh | 2.72 MWh |
| 2023 | 14.86 MWh | n/a |
| 2024 | 15.26 MWh | n/a |
| 2025 | 15.62 MWh | n/a |
Finland history · Ukraine history
Source: Ember (ember-energy.org), licensed under CC BY 4.0. Data as of 2022.
Related
Cite this page
World Power Monitor. (2022). Finland vs Ukraine: Electricity Compared. https://worldpowermonitor.com/compare/finland-vs-ukraine/
World Power Monitor. Finland vs Ukraine: Electricity Compared. Data as of 2022. Data from Ember. https://worldpowermonitor.com/compare/finland-vs-ukraine/
@misc{wpm_compare_finland_vs_ukraine_2022,
title = {{Finland vs Ukraine: Electricity Compared}},
author = {{World Power Monitor}},
year = {2022},
note = {Data as of 2022. Data from Ember.},
url = {https://worldpowermonitor.com/compare/finland-vs-ukraine/}
} Permalink: https://worldpowermonitor.com/compare/finland-vs-ukraine/
The Copy buttons add today's date as the access date.