Poland vs Sweden: Electricity Compared
Poland generated 173 TWh of electricity in 2025 and Sweden 170 TWh, according to Ember. Poland's largest source was coal (50.6%); Sweden's was hydro (40.1%). Each kWh generated emitted 591 gCO2/kWh in Poland and 35 gCO2/kWh in Sweden. These are Ember annual statistics for 2025, compiled from national sources; they are not real time.
Who is bigger and who is cleaner? Poland and Sweden generated about the same amount of electricity in 2025 (173 TWh and 170 TWh). Sweden has the cleaner electricity by carbon intensity, at 35 gCO2/kWh against 591 gCO2/kWh in Poland in 2025.
Why this comparison: neighbours by land border or interconnector and similar electricity demand on the same continent.
Open this comparison in the interactive tool to add more countries or change the metric.
Key Facts
- Coal supplied 50.6% of Poland's electricity in 2025, against none in Sweden.
- Poland's electricity was 16.7 times as carbon intensive as Sweden's in 2025, at 591 gCO2/kWh against 35 gCO2/kWh.
- The average person in Sweden used 12.83 MWh of electricity in 2025, 2.8 times as much as in Poland (4.55 MWh).
- Low carbon sources supplied 31.2% of Poland's electricity in 2025 and 98.8% of Sweden's.
- Electricity demand in 2025 was 174 TWh in Poland and 137 TWh in Sweden.
Key Figures, 2025
Ember annual statistics| Measure | Poland | Sweden |
|---|---|---|
| Total generation | 173 TWh | 170 TWh |
| Electricity demand | 174 TWh | 137 TWh |
| Demand per person | 4.55 MWh | 12.83 MWh |
| Carbon intensity | 591 gCO2/kWh | 35 gCO2/kWh |
| Power sector emissions | 102 MtCO2 | 6.02 MtCO2 |
| Low carbon share | 31.2% | 98.8% |
| Largest source | Coal 50.6% | Hydro 40.1% |
Generation Mix, 2025
Share of generation| Source | Poland | Sweden |
|---|---|---|
| Coal | 50.6% | 0.0% |
| Hydro | 1.0% | 40.1% |
| Nuclear | 0.0% | 27.4% |
| Wind | 13.9% | 22.8% |
| Gas | 14.4% | 0.1% |
| Solar | 11.3% | 2.6% |
| Bioenergy | 4.9% | 5.9% |
| Other fossil | 3.9% | 1.2% |
| Other renewables | 0.2% | 0.0% |
Carbon Intensity, 1990 to 2025
Ember annual statistics| Year | Poland | Sweden |
|---|---|---|
| 1990 | 967 gCO2/kWh | 33 gCO2/kWh |
| 1991 | 968 gCO2/kWh | 41 gCO2/kWh |
| 1992 | 967 gCO2/kWh | 46 gCO2/kWh |
| 1993 | 967 gCO2/kWh | 51 gCO2/kWh |
| 1994 | 964 gCO2/kWh | 57 gCO2/kWh |
| 1995 | 962 gCO2/kWh | 54 gCO2/kWh |
| 1996 | 961 gCO2/kWh | 79 gCO2/kWh |
| 1997 | 959 gCO2/kWh | 52 gCO2/kWh |
| 1998 | 957 gCO2/kWh | 49 gCO2/kWh |
| 1999 | 957 gCO2/kWh | 50 gCO2/kWh |
| 2000 | 955 gCO2/kWh | 45 gCO2/kWh |
| 2001 | 950 gCO2/kWh | 47 gCO2/kWh |
| 2002 | 946 gCO2/kWh | 56 gCO2/kWh |
| 2003 | 950 gCO2/kWh | 69 gCO2/kWh |
| 2004 | 941 gCO2/kWh | 48 gCO2/kWh |
| 2005 | 932 gCO2/kWh | 43 gCO2/kWh |
| 2006 | 932 gCO2/kWh | 50 gCO2/kWh |
| 2007 | 925 gCO2/kWh | 46 gCO2/kWh |
| 2008 | 919 gCO2/kWh | 48 gCO2/kWh |
| 2009 | 905 gCO2/kWh | 51 gCO2/kWh |
| 2010 | 893 gCO2/kWh | 64 gCO2/kWh |
| 2011 | 882 gCO2/kWh | 52 gCO2/kWh |
| 2012 | 861 gCO2/kWh | 45 gCO2/kWh |
| 2013 | 863 gCO2/kWh | 45 gCO2/kWh |
| 2014 | 844 gCO2/kWh | 40 gCO2/kWh |
| 2015 | 826 gCO2/kWh | 41 gCO2/kWh |
| 2016 | 819 gCO2/kWh | 43 gCO2/kWh |
| 2017 | 806 gCO2/kWh | 42 gCO2/kWh |
| 2018 | 809 gCO2/kWh | 43 gCO2/kWh |
| 2019 | 772 gCO2/kWh | 42 gCO2/kWh |
| 2020 | 738 gCO2/kWh | 39 gCO2/kWh |
| 2021 | 756 gCO2/kWh | 42 gCO2/kWh |
| 2022 | 733 gCO2/kWh | 41 gCO2/kWh |
| 2023 | 651 gCO2/kWh | 38 gCO2/kWh |
| 2024 | 608 gCO2/kWh | 35 gCO2/kWh |
| 2025 | 591 gCO2/kWh | 35 gCO2/kWh |
Demand per Person, 1990 to 2025
Ember annual statistics| Year | Poland | Sweden |
|---|---|---|
| 1990 | n/a | n/a |
| 1991 | n/a | n/a |
| 1992 | n/a | n/a |
| 1993 | n/a | n/a |
| 1994 | n/a | n/a |
| 1995 | n/a | n/a |
| 1996 | n/a | n/a |
| 1997 | n/a | n/a |
| 1998 | n/a | n/a |
| 1999 | n/a | n/a |
| 2000 | 3.58 MWh | 16.90 MWh |
| 2001 | 3.58 MWh | 17.35 MWh |
| 2002 | 3.54 MWh | 17.04 MWh |
| 2003 | 3.66 MWh | 16.55 MWh |
| 2004 | 3.75 MWh | 16.62 MWh |
| 2005 | 3.78 MWh | 16.72 MWh |
| 2006 | 3.93 MWh | 16.44 MWh |
| 2007 | 4.03 MWh | 16.41 MWh |
| 2008 | 4.05 MWh | 16.05 MWh |
| 2009 | 3.91 MWh | 15.20 MWh |
| 2010 | 4.08 MWh | 16.05 MWh |
| 2011 | 4.13 MWh | 15.14 MWh |
| 2012 | 4.15 MWh | 15.43 MWh |
| 2013 | 4.16 MWh | 14.90 MWh |
| 2014 | 4.20 MWh | 14.23 MWh |
| 2015 | 4.29 MWh | 14.23 MWh |
| 2016 | 4.39 MWh | 14.53 MWh |
| 2017 | 4.50 MWh | 14.44 MWh |
| 2018 | 4.58 MWh | 14.36 MWh |
| 2019 | 4.55 MWh | 13.84 MWh |
| 2020 | 4.47 MWh | 13.40 MWh |
| 2021 | 4.72 MWh | 14.04 MWh |
| 2022 | 4.61 MWh | 13.33 MWh |
| 2023 | 4.37 MWh | 13.04 MWh |
| 2024 | 4.52 MWh | 13.08 MWh |
| 2025 | 4.55 MWh | 12.83 MWh |
Poland history · Sweden history
Source: Ember (ember-energy.org), licensed under CC BY 4.0. Data as of 2025.
Related
Cite this page
World Power Monitor. (2025). Poland vs Sweden: Electricity Compared. https://worldpowermonitor.com/compare/poland-vs-sweden/
World Power Monitor. Poland vs Sweden: Electricity Compared. Data as of 2025. Data from Ember. https://worldpowermonitor.com/compare/poland-vs-sweden/
@misc{wpm_compare_poland_vs_sweden_2025,
title = {{Poland vs Sweden: Electricity Compared}},
author = {{World Power Monitor}},
year = {2025},
note = {Data as of 2025. Data from Ember.},
url = {https://worldpowermonitor.com/compare/poland-vs-sweden/}
} Permalink: https://worldpowermonitor.com/compare/poland-vs-sweden/
The Copy buttons add today's date as the access date.