Czechia vs Portugal: Electricity Compared
Czechia generated 75.5 TWh of electricity in 2025 and Portugal 51.1 TWh, according to Ember. Czechia's largest source was nuclear (42.3%); Portugal's was hydro (29.7%). Each kWh generated emitted 401 gCO2/kWh in Czechia and 128 gCO2/kWh in Portugal. These are Ember annual statistics for 2025, compiled from national sources; they are not real time.
Who is bigger and who is cleaner? Czechia is the bigger electricity producer, generating 1.5 times as much as Portugal in 2025 (75.5 TWh against 51.1 TWh). Portugal has the cleaner electricity by carbon intensity, at 128 gCO2/kWh against 401 gCO2/kWh in Czechia in 2025.
Why this comparison: similar electricity demand on the same continent.
Open this comparison in the interactive tool to add more countries or change the metric.
Key Facts
- Nuclear supplied 42.3% of Czechia's electricity in 2025, against none in Portugal.
- Czechia's electricity was 3.1 times as carbon intensive as Portugal's in 2025, at 401 gCO2/kWh against 128 gCO2/kWh.
- Low carbon sources supplied 59.2% of Czechia's electricity in 2025 and 80.9% of Portugal's.
- Electricity demand in 2025 was 68.1 TWh in Czechia and 60.4 TWh in Portugal.
Key Figures, 2025
Ember annual statistics| Measure | Czechia | Portugal |
|---|---|---|
| Total generation | 75.5 TWh | 51.1 TWh |
| Electricity demand | 68.1 TWh | 60.4 TWh |
| Demand per person | 6.42 MWh | 5.80 MWh |
| Carbon intensity | 401 gCO2/kWh | 128 gCO2/kWh |
| Power sector emissions | 30.3 MtCO2 | 6.53 MtCO2 |
| Low carbon share | 59.2% | 80.9% |
| Largest source | Nuclear 42.3% | Hydro 29.7% |
Generation Mix, 2025
Share of generation| Source | Czechia | Portugal |
|---|---|---|
| Nuclear | 42.3% | 0.0% |
| Coal | 35.2% | 0.0% |
| Hydro | 2.3% | 29.7% |
| Wind | 0.8% | 26.8% |
| Solar | 5.8% | 17.3% |
| Gas | 5.4% | 16.5% |
| Bioenergy | 8.0% | 6.6% |
| Other fossil | 0.2% | 2.6% |
| Other renewables | 0.0% | 0.4% |
Carbon Intensity, 1990 to 2025
Ember annual statistics| Year | Czechia | Portugal |
|---|---|---|
| 1990 | 778 gCO2/kWh | 540 gCO2/kWh |
| 1991 | 779 gCO2/kWh | 553 gCO2/kWh |
| 1992 | 767 gCO2/kWh | 650 gCO2/kWh |
| 1993 | 759 gCO2/kWh | 582 gCO2/kWh |
| 1994 | 747 gCO2/kWh | 540 gCO2/kWh |
| 1995 | 756 gCO2/kWh | 607 gCO2/kWh |
| 1996 | 749 gCO2/kWh | 482 gCO2/kWh |
| 1997 | 758 gCO2/kWh | 513 gCO2/kWh |
| 1998 | 749 gCO2/kWh | 515 gCO2/kWh |
| 1999 | 737 gCO2/kWh | 607 gCO2/kWh |
| 2000 | 767 gCO2/kWh | 546 gCO2/kWh |
| 2001 | 752 gCO2/kWh | 507 gCO2/kWh |
| 2002 | 699 gCO2/kWh | 593 gCO2/kWh |
| 2003 | 652 gCO2/kWh | 485 gCO2/kWh |
| 2004 | 640 gCO2/kWh | 541 gCO2/kWh |
| 2005 | 647 gCO2/kWh | 596 gCO2/kWh |
| 2006 | 634 gCO2/kWh | 504 gCO2/kWh |
| 2007 | 652 gCO2/kWh | 472 gCO2/kWh |
| 2008 | 628 gCO2/kWh | 472 gCO2/kWh |
| 2009 | 603 gCO2/kWh | 453 gCO2/kWh |
| 2010 | 594 gCO2/kWh | 317 gCO2/kWh |
| 2011 | 584 gCO2/kWh | 375 gCO2/kWh |
| 2012 | 553 gCO2/kWh | 441 gCO2/kWh |
| 2013 | 527 gCO2/kWh | 340 gCO2/kWh |
| 2014 | 531 gCO2/kWh | 326 gCO2/kWh |
| 2015 | 553 gCO2/kWh | 414 gCO2/kWh |
| 2016 | 574 gCO2/kWh | 344 gCO2/kWh |
| 2017 | 543 gCO2/kWh | 434 gCO2/kWh |
| 2018 | 533 gCO2/kWh | 359 gCO2/kWh |
| 2019 | 503 gCO2/kWh | 301 gCO2/kWh |
| 2020 | 460 gCO2/kWh | 248 gCO2/kWh |
| 2021 | 472 gCO2/kWh | 211 gCO2/kWh |
| 2022 | 488 gCO2/kWh | 225 gCO2/kWh |
| 2023 | 443 gCO2/kWh | 158 gCO2/kWh |
| 2024 | 414 gCO2/kWh | 111 gCO2/kWh |
| 2025 | 401 gCO2/kWh | 128 gCO2/kWh |
Demand per Person, 1990 to 2025
Ember annual statistics| Year | Czechia | Portugal |
|---|---|---|
| 1990 | n/a | n/a |
| 1991 | n/a | n/a |
| 1992 | n/a | n/a |
| 1993 | n/a | n/a |
| 1994 | n/a | n/a |
| 1995 | n/a | n/a |
| 1996 | n/a | n/a |
| 1997 | n/a | n/a |
| 1998 | n/a | n/a |
| 1999 | n/a | n/a |
| 2000 | 6.14 MWh | 4.29 MWh |
| 2001 | 6.32 MWh | 4.47 MWh |
| 2002 | 6.31 MWh | 4.56 MWh |
| 2003 | 6.50 MWh | 4.70 MWh |
| 2004 | 6.63 MWh | 4.88 MWh |
| 2005 | 6.74 MWh | 5.03 MWh |
| 2006 | 6.89 MWh | 5.12 MWh |
| 2007 | 6.93 MWh | 5.14 MWh |
| 2008 | 6.92 MWh | 5.19 MWh |
| 2009 | 6.53 MWh | 5.12 MWh |
| 2010 | 6.72 MWh | 5.30 MWh |
| 2011 | 6.63 MWh | 5.17 MWh |
| 2012 | 6.61 MWh | 5.07 MWh |
| 2013 | 6.57 MWh | 5.08 MWh |
| 2014 | 6.53 MWh | 5.06 MWh |
| 2015 | 6.65 MWh | 5.15 MWh |
| 2016 | 6.74 MWh | 5.22 MWh |
| 2017 | 6.90 MWh | 5.32 MWh |
| 2018 | 6.91 MWh | 5.39 MWh |
| 2019 | 6.88 MWh | 5.32 MWh |
| 2020 | 6.63 MWh | 5.10 MWh |
| 2021 | 6.89 MWh | 5.19 MWh |
| 2022 | 6.58 MWh | 5.34 MWh |
| 2023 | 6.16 MWh | 5.40 MWh |
| 2024 | 6.16 MWh | 5.54 MWh |
| 2025 | 6.42 MWh | 5.80 MWh |
Czechia history · Portugal history
Source: Ember (ember-energy.org), licensed under CC BY 4.0. Data as of 2025.
Related
Cite this page
World Power Monitor. (2025). Czechia vs Portugal: Electricity Compared. https://worldpowermonitor.com/compare/czechia-vs-portugal/
World Power Monitor. Czechia vs Portugal: Electricity Compared. Data as of 2025. Data from Ember. https://worldpowermonitor.com/compare/czechia-vs-portugal/
@misc{wpm_compare_czechia_vs_portugal_2025,
title = {{Czechia vs Portugal: Electricity Compared}},
author = {{World Power Monitor}},
year = {2025},
note = {Data as of 2025. Data from Ember.},
url = {https://worldpowermonitor.com/compare/czechia-vs-portugal/}
} Permalink: https://worldpowermonitor.com/compare/czechia-vs-portugal/
The Copy buttons add today's date as the access date.