Portugal vs Switzerland: Electricity Compared
Portugal generated 51.1 TWh of electricity in 2025 and Switzerland 65.0 TWh, according to Ember. Hydro was the largest source in both, at 29.7% in Portugal and 52.3% in Switzerland. Each kWh generated emitted 128 gCO2/kWh in Portugal and 39 gCO2/kWh in Switzerland. These are Ember annual statistics for 2025, compiled from national sources; they are not real time.
Who is bigger and who is cleaner? Switzerland is the bigger electricity producer, generating 1.3 times as much as Portugal in 2025 (65.0 TWh against 51.1 TWh). Switzerland has the cleaner electricity by carbon intensity, at 39 gCO2/kWh against 128 gCO2/kWh in Portugal in 2025.
Why this comparison: similar electricity demand on the same continent.
Open this comparison in the interactive tool to add more countries or change the metric.
Key Facts
- Nuclear supplied 29.9% of Switzerland's electricity in 2025, against none in Portugal.
- Portugal's electricity was 3.3 times as carbon intensive as Switzerland's in 2025, at 128 gCO2/kWh against 39 gCO2/kWh.
- Carbon intensity rose 7% in Switzerland between 2020 and 2025, while it fell 49% in Portugal.
- Low carbon sources supplied 80.9% of Portugal's electricity in 2025 and 97.7% of Switzerland's.
- Electricity demand in 2025 was 60.4 TWh in Portugal and 65.2 TWh in Switzerland.
Key Figures, 2025
Ember annual statistics| Measure | Portugal | Switzerland |
|---|---|---|
| Total generation | 51.1 TWh | 65.0 TWh |
| Electricity demand | 60.4 TWh | 65.2 TWh |
| Demand per person | 5.80 MWh | 7.26 MWh |
| Carbon intensity | 128 gCO2/kWh | 39 gCO2/kWh |
| Power sector emissions | 6.53 MtCO2 | 2.55 MtCO2 |
| Low carbon share | 80.9% | 97.7% |
| Largest source | Hydro 29.7% | Hydro 52.3% |
Generation Mix, 2025
Share of generation| Source | Portugal | Switzerland |
|---|---|---|
| Hydro | 29.7% | 52.3% |
| Nuclear | 0.0% | 29.9% |
| Wind | 26.8% | 0.2% |
| Solar | 17.3% | 12.1% |
| Gas | 16.5% | 0.4% |
| Bioenergy | 6.6% | 1.7% |
| Other fossil | 2.6% | 1.9% |
| Other renewables | 0.4% | 1.5% |
Carbon Intensity, 1990 to 2025
Ember annual statistics| Year | Portugal | Switzerland |
|---|---|---|
| 1990 | 540 gCO2/kWh | n/a |
| 1991 | 553 gCO2/kWh | n/a |
| 1992 | 650 gCO2/kWh | n/a |
| 1993 | 582 gCO2/kWh | n/a |
| 1994 | 540 gCO2/kWh | n/a |
| 1995 | 607 gCO2/kWh | n/a |
| 1996 | 482 gCO2/kWh | n/a |
| 1997 | 513 gCO2/kWh | n/a |
| 1998 | 515 gCO2/kWh | n/a |
| 1999 | 607 gCO2/kWh | n/a |
| 2000 | 546 gCO2/kWh | 34 gCO2/kWh |
| 2001 | 507 gCO2/kWh | 33 gCO2/kWh |
| 2002 | 593 gCO2/kWh | 34 gCO2/kWh |
| 2003 | 485 gCO2/kWh | 35 gCO2/kWh |
| 2004 | 541 gCO2/kWh | 35 gCO2/kWh |
| 2005 | 596 gCO2/kWh | 38 gCO2/kWh |
| 2006 | 504 gCO2/kWh | 36 gCO2/kWh |
| 2007 | 472 gCO2/kWh | 34 gCO2/kWh |
| 2008 | 472 gCO2/kWh | 34 gCO2/kWh |
| 2009 | 453 gCO2/kWh | 34 gCO2/kWh |
| 2010 | 317 gCO2/kWh | 36 gCO2/kWh |
| 2011 | 375 gCO2/kWh | 36 gCO2/kWh |
| 2012 | 441 gCO2/kWh | 36 gCO2/kWh |
| 2013 | 340 gCO2/kWh | 36 gCO2/kWh |
| 2014 | 326 gCO2/kWh | 34 gCO2/kWh |
| 2015 | 414 gCO2/kWh | 36 gCO2/kWh |
| 2016 | 344 gCO2/kWh | 40 gCO2/kWh |
| 2017 | 434 gCO2/kWh | 40 gCO2/kWh |
| 2018 | 359 gCO2/kWh | 36 gCO2/kWh |
| 2019 | 301 gCO2/kWh | 35 gCO2/kWh |
| 2020 | 248 gCO2/kWh | 37 gCO2/kWh |
| 2021 | 211 gCO2/kWh | 39 gCO2/kWh |
| 2022 | 225 gCO2/kWh | 37 gCO2/kWh |
| 2023 | 158 gCO2/kWh | 35 gCO2/kWh |
| 2024 | 111 gCO2/kWh | 35 gCO2/kWh |
| 2025 | 128 gCO2/kWh | 39 gCO2/kWh |
Demand per Person, 1990 to 2025
Ember annual statistics| Year | Portugal | Switzerland |
|---|---|---|
| 1990 | n/a | n/a |
| 1991 | n/a | n/a |
| 1992 | n/a | n/a |
| 1993 | n/a | n/a |
| 1994 | n/a | n/a |
| 1995 | n/a | n/a |
| 1996 | n/a | n/a |
| 1997 | n/a | n/a |
| 1998 | n/a | n/a |
| 1999 | n/a | n/a |
| 2000 | 4.29 MWh | 8.22 MWh |
| 2001 | 4.47 MWh | 8.39 MWh |
| 2002 | 4.56 MWh | 8.37 MWh |
| 2003 | 4.70 MWh | 8.49 MWh |
| 2004 | 4.88 MWh | 8.56 MWh |
| 2005 | 5.03 MWh | 8.63 MWh |
| 2006 | 5.12 MWh | 8.67 MWh |
| 2007 | 5.14 MWh | 8.53 MWh |
| 2008 | 5.19 MWh | 8.63 MWh |
| 2009 | 5.12 MWh | 8.34 MWh |
| 2010 | 5.30 MWh | 8.51 MWh |
| 2011 | 5.17 MWh | 8.27 MWh |
| 2012 | 5.07 MWh | 8.24 MWh |
| 2013 | 5.08 MWh | 8.19 MWh |
| 2014 | 5.06 MWh | 7.89 MWh |
| 2015 | 5.15 MWh | 7.85 MWh |
| 2016 | 5.22 MWh | 7.76 MWh |
| 2017 | 5.32 MWh | 7.77 MWh |
| 2018 | 5.39 MWh | 7.60 MWh |
| 2019 | 5.32 MWh | 7.50 MWh |
| 2020 | 5.10 MWh | 7.28 MWh |
| 2021 | 5.19 MWh | 7.52 MWh |
| 2022 | 5.34 MWh | 7.38 MWh |
| 2023 | 5.40 MWh | 7.18 MWh |
| 2024 | 5.54 MWh | 7.17 MWh |
| 2025 | 5.80 MWh | 7.26 MWh |
Portugal history · Switzerland history
Source: Ember (ember-energy.org), licensed under CC BY 4.0. Data as of 2025.
Related
Cite this page
World Power Monitor. (2025). Portugal vs Switzerland: Electricity Compared. https://worldpowermonitor.com/compare/portugal-vs-switzerland/
World Power Monitor. Portugal vs Switzerland: Electricity Compared. Data as of 2025. Data from Ember. https://worldpowermonitor.com/compare/portugal-vs-switzerland/
@misc{wpm_compare_portugal_vs_switzerland_2025,
title = {{Portugal vs Switzerland: Electricity Compared}},
author = {{World Power Monitor}},
year = {2025},
note = {Data as of 2025. Data from Ember.},
url = {https://worldpowermonitor.com/compare/portugal-vs-switzerland/}
} Permalink: https://worldpowermonitor.com/compare/portugal-vs-switzerland/
The Copy buttons add today's date as the access date.