Brazil vs France: Electricity Compared
Brazil generated 764 TWh of electricity in 2025 and France 574 TWh, according to Ember. Brazil's largest source was hydro (52.1%); France's was nuclear (68.3%). Each kWh generated emitted 109 gCO2/kWh in Brazil and 41 gCO2/kWh in France. These are Ember annual statistics for 2025, compiled from national sources; they are not real time.
Who is bigger and who is cleaner? Brazil is the bigger electricity producer, generating 1.3 times as much as France in 2025 (764 TWh against 574 TWh). France has the cleaner electricity by carbon intensity, at 41 gCO2/kWh against 109 gCO2/kWh in Brazil in 2025.
Why this comparison: both among the 20 largest electricity users.
Open this comparison in the interactive tool to add more countries or change the metric.
Key Facts
- Nuclear supplied 68.3% of France's electricity in 2025, against 2.1% in Brazil.
- Brazil's electricity was 2.6 times as carbon intensive as France's in 2025, at 109 gCO2/kWh against 41 gCO2/kWh.
- Low carbon sources supplied 88.9% of Brazil's electricity in 2025 and 94.9% of France's.
- Electricity demand in 2025 was 775 TWh in Brazil and 481 TWh in France.
Key Figures, 2025
Ember annual statistics| Measure | Brazil | France |
|---|---|---|
| Total generation | 764 TWh | 574 TWh |
| Electricity demand | 775 TWh | 481 TWh |
| Demand per person | 3.58 MWh | 7.15 MWh |
| Carbon intensity | 109 gCO2/kWh | 41 gCO2/kWh |
| Power sector emissions | 83.4 MtCO2 | 23.7 MtCO2 |
| Low carbon share | 88.9% | 94.9% |
| Largest source | Hydro 52.1% | Nuclear 68.3% |
Generation Mix, 2025
Share of generation| Source | Brazil | France |
|---|---|---|
| Nuclear | 2.1% | 68.3% |
| Hydro | 52.1% | 10.3% |
| Wind | 15.2% | 8.8% |
| Solar | 11.5% | 5.6% |
| Bioenergy | 8.1% | 1.8% |
| Gas | 7.8% | 3.0% |
| Coal | 2.1% | 0.3% |
| Other fossil | 1.3% | 1.8% |
| Other renewables | 0.0% | 0.1% |
Carbon Intensity, 1985 to 2025
Ember annual statistics| Year | Brazil | France |
|---|---|---|
| 1985 | 61 gCO2/kWh | n/a |
| 1986 | 85 gCO2/kWh | n/a |
| 1987 | 74 gCO2/kWh | n/a |
| 1988 | 66 gCO2/kWh | n/a |
| 1989 | 66 gCO2/kWh | n/a |
| 1990 | 60 gCO2/kWh | 104 gCO2/kWh |
| 1991 | 62 gCO2/kWh | 122 gCO2/kWh |
| 1992 | 63 gCO2/kWh | 102 gCO2/kWh |
| 1993 | 61 gCO2/kWh | 69 gCO2/kWh |
| 1994 | 61 gCO2/kWh | 67 gCO2/kWh |
| 1995 | 63 gCO2/kWh | 73 gCO2/kWh |
| 1996 | 68 gCO2/kWh | 79 gCO2/kWh |
| 1997 | 71 gCO2/kWh | 71 gCO2/kWh |
| 1998 | 71 gCO2/kWh | 97 gCO2/kWh |
| 1999 | 90 gCO2/kWh | 87 gCO2/kWh |
| 2000 | 89 gCO2/kWh | 80 gCO2/kWh |
| 2001 | 106 gCO2/kWh | 69 gCO2/kWh |
| 2002 | 97 gCO2/kWh | 75 gCO2/kWh |
| 2003 | 91 gCO2/kWh | 81 gCO2/kWh |
| 2004 | 102 gCO2/kWh | 77 gCO2/kWh |
| 2005 | 99 gCO2/kWh | 86 gCO2/kWh |
| 2006 | 96 gCO2/kWh | 77 gCO2/kWh |
| 2007 | 91 gCO2/kWh | 80 gCO2/kWh |
| 2008 | 114 gCO2/kWh | 76 gCO2/kWh |
| 2009 | 87 gCO2/kWh | 76 gCO2/kWh |
| 2010 | 114 gCO2/kWh | 79 gCO2/kWh |
| 2011 | 100 gCO2/kWh | 75 gCO2/kWh |
| 2012 | 128 gCO2/kWh | 78 gCO2/kWh |
| 2013 | 168 gCO2/kWh | 76 gCO2/kWh |
| 2014 | 193 gCO2/kWh | 52 gCO2/kWh |
| 2015 | 189 gCO2/kWh | 59 gCO2/kWh |
| 2016 | 150 gCO2/kWh | 69 gCO2/kWh |
| 2017 | 156 gCO2/kWh | 78 gCO2/kWh |
| 2018 | 137 gCO2/kWh | 60 gCO2/kWh |
| 2019 | 142 gCO2/kWh | 60 gCO2/kWh |
| 2020 | 133 gCO2/kWh | 59 gCO2/kWh |
| 2021 | 168 gCO2/kWh | 60 gCO2/kWh |
| 2022 | 103 gCO2/kWh | 79 gCO2/kWh |
| 2023 | 96 gCO2/kWh | 53 gCO2/kWh |
| 2024 | 106 gCO2/kWh | 40 gCO2/kWh |
| 2025 | 109 gCO2/kWh | 41 gCO2/kWh |
Demand per Person, 1985 to 2025
Ember annual statistics| Year | Brazil | France |
|---|---|---|
| 1985 | n/a | n/a |
| 1986 | n/a | n/a |
| 1987 | n/a | n/a |
| 1988 | n/a | n/a |
| 1989 | n/a | n/a |
| 1990 | n/a | n/a |
| 1991 | n/a | n/a |
| 1992 | n/a | n/a |
| 1993 | n/a | n/a |
| 1994 | n/a | n/a |
| 1995 | n/a | n/a |
| 1996 | n/a | n/a |
| 1997 | n/a | n/a |
| 1998 | n/a | n/a |
| 1999 | n/a | n/a |
| 2000 | 2.25 MWh | 7.79 MWh |
| 2001 | 2.08 MWh | 7.92 MWh |
| 2002 | 2.14 MWh | 7.86 MWh |
| 2003 | 2.23 MWh | 8.11 MWh |
| 2004 | 2.33 MWh | 8.25 MWh |
| 2005 | 2.39 MWh | 8.26 MWh |
| 2006 | 2.47 MWh | 8.12 MWh |
| 2007 | 2.57 MWh | 8.09 MWh |
| 2008 | 2.66 MWh | 8.27 MWh |
| 2009 | 2.64 MWh | 7.97 MWh |
| 2010 | 2.84 MWh | 8.38 MWh |
| 2011 | 2.91 MWh | 8.02 MWh |
| 2012 | 3.01 MWh | 8.17 MWh |
| 2013 | 3.08 MWh | 8.21 MWh |
| 2014 | 3.12 MWh | 7.72 MWh |
| 2015 | 3.05 MWh | 7.86 MWh |
| 2016 | 3.05 MWh | 7.95 MWh |
| 2017 | 3.06 MWh | 7.90 MWh |
| 2018 | 3.09 MWh | 7.83 MWh |
| 2019 | 3.17 MWh | 7.73 MWh |
| 2020 | 3.13 MWh | 7.32 MWh |
| 2021 | 3.24 MWh | 7.65 MWh |
| 2022 | 3.28 MWh | 7.29 MWh |
| 2023 | 3.43 MWh | 7.05 MWh |
| 2024 | 3.57 MWh | 7.09 MWh |
| 2025 | 3.58 MWh | 7.15 MWh |
Brazil history · France history
Source: Ember (ember-energy.org), licensed under CC BY 4.0. Data as of 2025.
Related
Cite this page
World Power Monitor. (2025). Brazil vs France: Electricity Compared. https://worldpowermonitor.com/compare/brazil-vs-france/
World Power Monitor. Brazil vs France: Electricity Compared. Data as of 2025. Data from Ember. https://worldpowermonitor.com/compare/brazil-vs-france/
@misc{wpm_compare_brazil_vs_france_2025,
title = {{Brazil vs France: Electricity Compared}},
author = {{World Power Monitor}},
year = {2025},
note = {Data as of 2025. Data from Ember.},
url = {https://worldpowermonitor.com/compare/brazil-vs-france/}
} Permalink: https://worldpowermonitor.com/compare/brazil-vs-france/
The Copy buttons add today's date as the access date.