Brazil vs Germany: Electricity Compared
Brazil generated 764 TWh of electricity in 2025 and Germany 497 TWh, according to Ember. Brazil's largest source was hydro (52.1%); Germany's was wind (26.6%). Each kWh generated emitted 109 gCO2/kWh in Brazil and 334 gCO2/kWh in Germany. These are Ember annual statistics for 2025, compiled from national sources; they are not real time.
Who is bigger and who is cleaner? Brazil is the bigger electricity producer, generating 1.5 times as much as Germany in 2025 (764 TWh against 497 TWh). Brazil has the cleaner electricity by carbon intensity, at 109 gCO2/kWh against 334 gCO2/kWh in Germany in 2025.
Why this comparison: both among the 20 largest electricity users.
Open this comparison in the interactive tool to add more countries or change the metric.
Key Facts
- Hydro supplied 52.1% of Brazil's electricity in 2025, against 3.7% in Germany.
- Germany's electricity was 3.1 times as carbon intensive as Brazil's in 2025, at 334 gCO2/kWh against 109 gCO2/kWh.
- Electricity demand rose 19% in Brazil between 2020 and 2025, while it fell 6% in Germany.
- Low carbon sources supplied 88.9% of Brazil's electricity in 2025 and 58.5% of Germany's.
- Electricity demand in 2025 was 775 TWh in Brazil and 517 TWh in Germany.
Key Figures, 2025
Ember annual statistics| Measure | Brazil | Germany |
|---|---|---|
| Total generation | 764 TWh | 497 TWh |
| Electricity demand | 775 TWh | 517 TWh |
| Demand per person | 3.58 MWh | 6.19 MWh |
| Carbon intensity | 109 gCO2/kWh | 334 gCO2/kWh |
| Power sector emissions | 83.4 MtCO2 | 166 MtCO2 |
| Low carbon share | 88.9% | 58.5% |
| Largest source | Hydro 52.1% | Wind 26.6% |
Generation Mix, 2025
Share of generation| Source | Brazil | Germany |
|---|---|---|
| Hydro | 52.1% | 3.7% |
| Wind | 15.2% | 26.6% |
| Coal | 2.1% | 21.0% |
| Solar | 11.5% | 18.1% |
| Gas | 7.8% | 16.8% |
| Bioenergy | 8.1% | 10.1% |
| Other fossil | 1.3% | 3.8% |
| Nuclear | 2.1% | 0.0% |
| Other renewables | 0.0% | 0.1% |
Carbon Intensity, 1985 to 2025
Ember annual statistics| Year | Brazil | Germany |
|---|---|---|
| 1985 | 61 gCO2/kWh | 431 gCO2/kWh |
| 1986 | 85 gCO2/kWh | 431 gCO2/kWh |
| 1987 | 74 gCO2/kWh | 431 gCO2/kWh |
| 1988 | 66 gCO2/kWh | 431 gCO2/kWh |
| 1989 | 66 gCO2/kWh | 431 gCO2/kWh |
| 1990 | 60 gCO2/kWh | 622 gCO2/kWh |
| 1991 | 62 gCO2/kWh | 628 gCO2/kWh |
| 1992 | 63 gCO2/kWh | 605 gCO2/kWh |
| 1993 | 61 gCO2/kWh | 608 gCO2/kWh |
| 1994 | 61 gCO2/kWh | 604 gCO2/kWh |
| 1995 | 63 gCO2/kWh | 596 gCO2/kWh |
| 1996 | 68 gCO2/kWh | 591 gCO2/kWh |
| 1997 | 71 gCO2/kWh | 575 gCO2/kWh |
| 1998 | 71 gCO2/kWh | 587 gCO2/kWh |
| 1999 | 90 gCO2/kWh | 566 gCO2/kWh |
| 2000 | 89 gCO2/kWh | 573 gCO2/kWh |
| 2001 | 106 gCO2/kWh | 565 gCO2/kWh |
| 2002 | 97 gCO2/kWh | 570 gCO2/kWh |
| 2003 | 91 gCO2/kWh | 570 gCO2/kWh |
| 2004 | 102 gCO2/kWh | 555 gCO2/kWh |
| 2005 | 99 gCO2/kWh | 546 gCO2/kWh |
| 2006 | 96 gCO2/kWh | 536 gCO2/kWh |
| 2007 | 91 gCO2/kWh | 552 gCO2/kWh |
| 2008 | 114 gCO2/kWh | 525 gCO2/kWh |
| 2009 | 87 gCO2/kWh | 522 gCO2/kWh |
| 2010 | 114 gCO2/kWh | 517 gCO2/kWh |
| 2011 | 100 gCO2/kWh | 530 gCO2/kWh |
| 2012 | 128 gCO2/kWh | 534 gCO2/kWh |
| 2013 | 168 gCO2/kWh | 538 gCO2/kWh |
| 2014 | 193 gCO2/kWh | 522 gCO2/kWh |
| 2015 | 189 gCO2/kWh | 504 gCO2/kWh |
| 2016 | 150 gCO2/kWh | 498 gCO2/kWh |
| 2017 | 156 gCO2/kWh | 470 gCO2/kWh |
| 2018 | 137 gCO2/kWh | 455 gCO2/kWh |
| 2019 | 142 gCO2/kWh | 392 gCO2/kWh |
| 2020 | 133 gCO2/kWh | 356 gCO2/kWh |
| 2021 | 168 gCO2/kWh | 395 gCO2/kWh |
| 2022 | 103 gCO2/kWh | 420 gCO2/kWh |
| 2023 | 96 gCO2/kWh | 364 gCO2/kWh |
| 2024 | 106 gCO2/kWh | 340 gCO2/kWh |
| 2025 | 109 gCO2/kWh | 334 gCO2/kWh |
Demand per Person, 1985 to 2025
Ember annual statistics| Year | Brazil | Germany |
|---|---|---|
| 1985 | n/a | n/a |
| 1986 | n/a | n/a |
| 1987 | n/a | n/a |
| 1988 | n/a | n/a |
| 1989 | n/a | n/a |
| 1990 | n/a | n/a |
| 1991 | n/a | n/a |
| 1992 | n/a | n/a |
| 1993 | n/a | n/a |
| 1994 | n/a | n/a |
| 1995 | n/a | n/a |
| 1996 | n/a | n/a |
| 1997 | n/a | n/a |
| 1998 | n/a | n/a |
| 1999 | n/a | n/a |
| 2000 | 2.25 MWh | 6.99 MWh |
| 2001 | 2.08 MWh | 7.11 MWh |
| 2002 | 2.14 MWh | 7.24 MWh |
| 2003 | 2.23 MWh | 7.29 MWh |
| 2004 | 2.33 MWh | 7.39 MWh |
| 2005 | 2.39 MWh | 7.42 MWh |
| 2006 | 2.47 MWh | 7.51 MWh |
| 2007 | 2.57 MWh | 7.56 MWh |
| 2008 | 2.66 MWh | 7.55 MWh |
| 2009 | 2.64 MWh | 7.11 MWh |
| 2010 | 2.84 MWh | 7.54 MWh |
| 2011 | 2.91 MWh | 7.44 MWh |
| 2012 | 3.01 MWh | 7.41 MWh |
| 2013 | 3.08 MWh | 7.37 MWh |
| 2014 | 3.12 MWh | 7.19 MWh |
| 2015 | 3.05 MWh | 7.20 MWh |
| 2016 | 3.05 MWh | 7.14 MWh |
| 2017 | 3.06 MWh | 7.12 MWh |
| 2018 | 3.09 MWh | 7.00 MWh |
| 2019 | 3.17 MWh | 6.79 MWh |
| 2020 | 3.13 MWh | 6.55 MWh |
| 2021 | 3.24 MWh | 6.69 MWh |
| 2022 | 3.28 MWh | 6.42 MWh |
| 2023 | 3.43 MWh | 6.10 MWh |
| 2024 | 3.57 MWh | 6.18 MWh |
| 2025 | 3.58 MWh | 6.19 MWh |
Brazil history · Germany history
Source: Ember (ember-energy.org), licensed under CC BY 4.0. Data as of 2025.
Related
Cite this page
World Power Monitor. (2025). Brazil vs Germany: Electricity Compared. https://worldpowermonitor.com/compare/brazil-vs-germany/
World Power Monitor. Brazil vs Germany: Electricity Compared. Data as of 2025. Data from Ember. https://worldpowermonitor.com/compare/brazil-vs-germany/
@misc{wpm_compare_brazil_vs_germany_2025,
title = {{Brazil vs Germany: Electricity Compared}},
author = {{World Power Monitor}},
year = {2025},
note = {Data as of 2025. Data from Ember.},
url = {https://worldpowermonitor.com/compare/brazil-vs-germany/}
} Permalink: https://worldpowermonitor.com/compare/brazil-vs-germany/
The Copy buttons add today's date as the access date.