Brazil vs Italy: Electricity Compared
Brazil generated 764 TWh of electricity in 2025 and Italy 265 TWh, according to Ember. Brazil's largest source was hydro (52.1%); Italy's was gas (47.4%). Each kWh generated emitted 109 gCO2/kWh in Brazil and 285 gCO2/kWh in Italy. These are Ember annual statistics for 2025, compiled from national sources; they are not real time.
Who is bigger and who is cleaner? Brazil is the bigger electricity producer, generating 2.9 times as much as Italy in 2025 (764 TWh against 265 TWh). Brazil has the cleaner electricity by carbon intensity, at 109 gCO2/kWh against 285 gCO2/kWh in Italy in 2025.
Why this comparison: both among the 20 largest electricity users.
Open this comparison in the interactive tool to add more countries or change the metric.
Key Facts
- Gas supplied 47.4% of Italy's electricity in 2025, against 7.8% in Brazil.
- Italy's electricity was 2.6 times as carbon intensive as Brazil's in 2025, at 285 gCO2/kWh against 109 gCO2/kWh.
- Low carbon sources supplied 88.9% of Brazil's electricity in 2025 and 48.7% of Italy's.
- Electricity demand in 2025 was 775 TWh in Brazil and 312 TWh in Italy.
Key Figures, 2025
Ember annual statistics| Measure | Brazil | Italy |
|---|---|---|
| Total generation | 764 TWh | 265 TWh |
| Electricity demand | 775 TWh | 312 TWh |
| Demand per person | 3.58 MWh | 5.27 MWh |
| Carbon intensity | 109 gCO2/kWh | 285 gCO2/kWh |
| Power sector emissions | 83.4 MtCO2 | 75.6 MtCO2 |
| Low carbon share | 88.9% | 48.7% |
| Largest source | Hydro 52.1% | Gas 47.4% |
Generation Mix, 2025
Share of generation| Source | Brazil | Italy |
|---|---|---|
| Hydro | 52.1% | 15.7% |
| Gas | 7.8% | 47.4% |
| Solar | 11.5% | 16.8% |
| Wind | 15.2% | 8.1% |
| Bioenergy | 8.1% | 5.9% |
| Other fossil | 1.3% | 2.6% |
| Other renewables | 0.0% | 2.1% |
| Nuclear | 2.1% | 0.0% |
| Coal | 2.1% | 1.4% |
Carbon Intensity, 1985 to 2025
Ember annual statistics| Year | Brazil | Italy |
|---|---|---|
| 1985 | 61 gCO2/kWh | n/a |
| 1986 | 85 gCO2/kWh | n/a |
| 1987 | 74 gCO2/kWh | n/a |
| 1988 | 66 gCO2/kWh | n/a |
| 1989 | 66 gCO2/kWh | n/a |
| 1990 | 60 gCO2/kWh | 564 gCO2/kWh |
| 1991 | 62 gCO2/kWh | 534 gCO2/kWh |
| 1992 | 63 gCO2/kWh | 527 gCO2/kWh |
| 1993 | 61 gCO2/kWh | 518 gCO2/kWh |
| 1994 | 61 gCO2/kWh | 518 gCO2/kWh |
| 1995 | 63 gCO2/kWh | 542 gCO2/kWh |
| 1996 | 68 gCO2/kWh | 525 gCO2/kWh |
| 1997 | 71 gCO2/kWh | 520 gCO2/kWh |
| 1998 | 71 gCO2/kWh | 520 gCO2/kWh |
| 1999 | 90 gCO2/kWh | 501 gCO2/kWh |
| 2000 | 89 gCO2/kWh | 502 gCO2/kWh |
| 2001 | 106 gCO2/kWh | 499 gCO2/kWh |
| 2002 | 97 gCO2/kWh | 523 gCO2/kWh |
| 2003 | 91 gCO2/kWh | 523 gCO2/kWh |
| 2004 | 102 gCO2/kWh | 511 gCO2/kWh |
| 2005 | 99 gCO2/kWh | 510 gCO2/kWh |
| 2006 | 96 gCO2/kWh | 507 gCO2/kWh |
| 2007 | 91 gCO2/kWh | 505 gCO2/kWh |
| 2008 | 114 gCO2/kWh | 485 gCO2/kWh |
| 2009 | 87 gCO2/kWh | 459 gCO2/kWh |
| 2010 | 114 gCO2/kWh | 446 gCO2/kWh |
| 2011 | 100 gCO2/kWh | 446 gCO2/kWh |
| 2012 | 128 gCO2/kWh | 438 gCO2/kWh |
| 2013 | 168 gCO2/kWh | 399 gCO2/kWh |
| 2014 | 193 gCO2/kWh | 379 gCO2/kWh |
| 2015 | 189 gCO2/kWh | 399 gCO2/kWh |
| 2016 | 150 gCO2/kWh | 390 gCO2/kWh |
| 2017 | 156 gCO2/kWh | 393 gCO2/kWh |
| 2018 | 137 gCO2/kWh | 367 gCO2/kWh |
| 2019 | 142 gCO2/kWh | 351 gCO2/kWh |
| 2020 | 133 gCO2/kWh | 334 gCO2/kWh |
| 2021 | 168 gCO2/kWh | 339 gCO2/kWh |
| 2022 | 103 gCO2/kWh | 378 gCO2/kWh |
| 2023 | 96 gCO2/kWh | 323 gCO2/kWh |
| 2024 | 106 gCO2/kWh | 281 gCO2/kWh |
| 2025 | 109 gCO2/kWh | 285 gCO2/kWh |
Demand per Person, 1985 to 2025
Ember annual statistics| Year | Brazil | Italy |
|---|---|---|
| 1985 | n/a | n/a |
| 1986 | n/a | n/a |
| 1987 | n/a | n/a |
| 1988 | n/a | n/a |
| 1989 | n/a | n/a |
| 1990 | n/a | n/a |
| 1991 | n/a | n/a |
| 1992 | n/a | n/a |
| 1993 | n/a | n/a |
| 1994 | n/a | n/a |
| 1995 | n/a | n/a |
| 1996 | n/a | n/a |
| 1997 | n/a | n/a |
| 1998 | n/a | n/a |
| 1999 | n/a | n/a |
| 2000 | 2.25 MWh | 5.49 MWh |
| 2001 | 2.08 MWh | 5.59 MWh |
| 2002 | 2.14 MWh | 5.71 MWh |
| 2003 | 2.23 MWh | 5.84 MWh |
| 2004 | 2.33 MWh | 5.83 MWh |
| 2005 | 2.39 MWh | 5.88 MWh |
| 2006 | 2.47 MWh | 5.97 MWh |
| 2007 | 2.57 MWh | 5.96 MWh |
| 2008 | 2.66 MWh | 5.90 MWh |
| 2009 | 2.64 MWh | 5.53 MWh |
| 2010 | 2.84 MWh | 5.66 MWh |
| 2011 | 2.91 MWh | 5.70 MWh |
| 2012 | 3.01 MWh | 5.59 MWh |
| 2013 | 3.08 MWh | 5.41 MWh |
| 2014 | 3.12 MWh | 5.28 MWh |
| 2015 | 3.05 MWh | 5.38 MWh |
| 2016 | 3.05 MWh | 5.34 MWh |
| 2017 | 3.06 MWh | 5.46 MWh |
| 2018 | 3.09 MWh | 5.47 MWh |
| 2019 | 3.17 MWh | 5.46 MWh |
| 2020 | 3.13 MWh | 5.16 MWh |
| 2021 | 3.24 MWh | 5.50 MWh |
| 2022 | 3.28 MWh | 5.42 MWh |
| 2023 | 3.43 MWh | 5.26 MWh |
| 2024 | 3.57 MWh | 5.37 MWh |
| 2025 | 3.58 MWh | 5.27 MWh |
Brazil history · Italy history
Source: Ember (ember-energy.org), licensed under CC BY 4.0. Data as of 2025.
Related
Cite this page
World Power Monitor. (2025). Brazil vs Italy: Electricity Compared. https://worldpowermonitor.com/compare/brazil-vs-italy/
World Power Monitor. Brazil vs Italy: Electricity Compared. Data as of 2025. Data from Ember. https://worldpowermonitor.com/compare/brazil-vs-italy/
@misc{wpm_compare_brazil_vs_italy_2025,
title = {{Brazil vs Italy: Electricity Compared}},
author = {{World Power Monitor}},
year = {2025},
note = {Data as of 2025. Data from Ember.},
url = {https://worldpowermonitor.com/compare/brazil-vs-italy/}
} Permalink: https://worldpowermonitor.com/compare/brazil-vs-italy/
The Copy buttons add today's date as the access date.