Brazil vs Saudi Arabia: Electricity Compared
Brazil generated 764 TWh of electricity in 2025 and Saudi Arabia 471 TWh, according to Ember. Brazil's largest source was hydro (52.1%); Saudi Arabia's was gas (63.7%). Each kWh generated emitted 109 gCO2/kWh in Brazil and 680 gCO2/kWh in Saudi Arabia. These are Ember annual statistics for 2025, compiled from national sources; they are not real time.
Who is bigger and who is cleaner? Brazil is the bigger electricity producer, generating 1.6 times as much as Saudi Arabia in 2025 (764 TWh against 471 TWh). Brazil has the cleaner electricity by carbon intensity, at 109 gCO2/kWh against 680 gCO2/kWh in Saudi Arabia in 2025.
Why this comparison: both among the 20 largest electricity users.
Open this comparison in the interactive tool to add more countries or change the metric.
Key Facts
- Gas supplied 63.7% of Saudi Arabia's electricity in 2025, against 7.8% in Brazil.
- Saudi Arabia's electricity was 6.2 times as carbon intensive as Brazil's in 2025, at 680 gCO2/kWh against 109 gCO2/kWh.
- Low carbon sources supplied 88.9% of Brazil's electricity in 2025 and 4.2% of Saudi Arabia's.
- Electricity demand in 2025 was 775 TWh in Brazil and 471 TWh in Saudi Arabia.
Key Figures, 2025
Ember annual statistics| Measure | Brazil | Saudi Arabia |
|---|---|---|
| Total generation | 764 TWh | 471 TWh |
| Electricity demand | 775 TWh | 471 TWh |
| Demand per person | 3.58 MWh | n/a |
| Carbon intensity | 109 gCO2/kWh | 680 gCO2/kWh |
| Power sector emissions | 83.4 MtCO2 | 320 MtCO2 |
| Low carbon share | 88.9% | 4.2% |
| Largest source | Hydro 52.1% | Gas 63.7% |
Generation Mix, 2025
Share of generationCarbon Intensity, 1985 to 2025
Ember annual statistics| Year | Brazil | Saudi Arabia |
|---|---|---|
| 1985 | 61 gCO2/kWh | 701 gCO2/kWh |
| 1986 | 85 gCO2/kWh | 699 gCO2/kWh |
| 1987 | 74 gCO2/kWh | 696 gCO2/kWh |
| 1988 | 66 gCO2/kWh | 695 gCO2/kWh |
| 1989 | 66 gCO2/kWh | 696 gCO2/kWh |
| 1990 | 60 gCO2/kWh | 696 gCO2/kWh |
| 1991 | 62 gCO2/kWh | 696 gCO2/kWh |
| 1992 | 63 gCO2/kWh | 693 gCO2/kWh |
| 1993 | 61 gCO2/kWh | 693 gCO2/kWh |
| 1994 | 61 gCO2/kWh | 694 gCO2/kWh |
| 1995 | 63 gCO2/kWh | 692 gCO2/kWh |
| 1996 | 68 gCO2/kWh | 691 gCO2/kWh |
| 1997 | 71 gCO2/kWh | 691 gCO2/kWh |
| 1998 | 71 gCO2/kWh | 690 gCO2/kWh |
| 1999 | 90 gCO2/kWh | 689 gCO2/kWh |
| 2000 | 89 gCO2/kWh | 692 gCO2/kWh |
| 2001 | 106 gCO2/kWh | 697 gCO2/kWh |
| 2002 | 97 gCO2/kWh | 700 gCO2/kWh |
| 2003 | 91 gCO2/kWh | 699 gCO2/kWh |
| 2004 | 102 gCO2/kWh | 700 gCO2/kWh |
| 2005 | 99 gCO2/kWh | 700 gCO2/kWh |
| 2006 | 96 gCO2/kWh | 698 gCO2/kWh |
| 2007 | 91 gCO2/kWh | 695 gCO2/kWh |
| 2008 | 114 gCO2/kWh | 695 gCO2/kWh |
| 2009 | 87 gCO2/kWh | 690 gCO2/kWh |
| 2010 | 114 gCO2/kWh | 691 gCO2/kWh |
| 2011 | 100 gCO2/kWh | 691 gCO2/kWh |
| 2012 | 128 gCO2/kWh | 693 gCO2/kWh |
| 2013 | 168 gCO2/kWh | 693 gCO2/kWh |
| 2014 | 193 gCO2/kWh | 693 gCO2/kWh |
| 2015 | 189 gCO2/kWh | 693 gCO2/kWh |
| 2016 | 150 gCO2/kWh | 697 gCO2/kWh |
| 2017 | 156 gCO2/kWh | 700 gCO2/kWh |
| 2018 | 137 gCO2/kWh | 703 gCO2/kWh |
| 2019 | 142 gCO2/kWh | 702 gCO2/kWh |
| 2020 | 133 gCO2/kWh | 702 gCO2/kWh |
| 2021 | 168 gCO2/kWh | 702 gCO2/kWh |
| 2022 | 103 gCO2/kWh | 700 gCO2/kWh |
| 2023 | 96 gCO2/kWh | 697 gCO2/kWh |
| 2024 | 106 gCO2/kWh | 692 gCO2/kWh |
| 2025 | 109 gCO2/kWh | 680 gCO2/kWh |
Demand per Person, 1985 to 2025
Ember annual statistics| Year | Brazil | Saudi Arabia |
|---|---|---|
| 1985 | n/a | n/a |
| 1986 | n/a | n/a |
| 1987 | n/a | n/a |
| 1988 | n/a | n/a |
| 1989 | n/a | n/a |
| 1990 | n/a | n/a |
| 1991 | n/a | n/a |
| 1992 | n/a | n/a |
| 1993 | n/a | n/a |
| 1994 | n/a | n/a |
| 1995 | n/a | n/a |
| 1996 | n/a | n/a |
| 1997 | n/a | n/a |
| 1998 | n/a | n/a |
| 1999 | n/a | n/a |
| 2000 | 2.25 MWh | 8.57 MWh |
| 2001 | 2.08 MWh | 8.57 MWh |
| 2002 | 2.14 MWh | 8.65 MWh |
| 2003 | 2.23 MWh | 8.87 MWh |
| 2004 | 2.33 MWh | 8.82 MWh |
| 2005 | 2.39 MWh | 9.29 MWh |
| 2006 | 2.47 MWh | 9.15 MWh |
| 2007 | 2.57 MWh | 9.14 MWh |
| 2008 | 2.66 MWh | 8.77 MWh |
| 2009 | 2.64 MWh | 8.97 MWh |
| 2010 | 2.84 MWh | 9.89 MWh |
| 2011 | 2.91 MWh | 9.92 MWh |
| 2012 | 3.01 MWh | 10.41 MWh |
| 2013 | 3.08 MWh | 10.51 MWh |
| 2014 | 3.12 MWh | 11.32 MWh |
| 2015 | 3.05 MWh | 11.70 MWh |
| 2016 | 3.05 MWh | 11.62 MWh |
| 2017 | 3.06 MWh | 12.83 MWh |
| 2018 | 3.09 MWh | 12.34 MWh |
| 2019 | 3.17 MWh | 12.43 MWh |
| 2020 | 3.13 MWh | 12.28 MWh |
| 2021 | 3.24 MWh | 12.54 MWh |
| 2022 | 3.28 MWh | 12.74 MWh |
| 2023 | 3.43 MWh | 12.90 MWh |
| 2024 | 3.57 MWh | 13.39 MWh |
| 2025 | 3.58 MWh | n/a |
Brazil history · Saudi Arabia history
Source: Ember (ember-energy.org), licensed under CC BY 4.0. Data as of 2025.
Related
Cite this page
World Power Monitor. (2025). Brazil vs Saudi Arabia: Electricity Compared. https://worldpowermonitor.com/compare/brazil-vs-saudi-arabia/
World Power Monitor. Brazil vs Saudi Arabia: Electricity Compared. Data as of 2025. Data from Ember. https://worldpowermonitor.com/compare/brazil-vs-saudi-arabia/
@misc{wpm_compare_brazil_vs_saudi_arabia_2025,
title = {{Brazil vs Saudi Arabia: Electricity Compared}},
author = {{World Power Monitor}},
year = {2025},
note = {Data as of 2025. Data from Ember.},
url = {https://worldpowermonitor.com/compare/brazil-vs-saudi-arabia/}
} Permalink: https://worldpowermonitor.com/compare/brazil-vs-saudi-arabia/
The Copy buttons add today's date as the access date.