Brazil vs Taiwan: Electricity Compared
Brazil generated 764 TWh of electricity in 2025 and Taiwan 289 TWh, according to Ember. Brazil's largest source was hydro (52.1%); Taiwan's was gas (48.8%). Each kWh generated emitted 109 gCO2/kWh in Brazil and 634 gCO2/kWh in Taiwan. These are Ember annual statistics for 2025, compiled from national sources; they are not real time.
Who is bigger and who is cleaner? Brazil is the bigger electricity producer, generating 2.6 times as much as Taiwan in 2025 (764 TWh against 289 TWh). Brazil has the cleaner electricity by carbon intensity, at 109 gCO2/kWh against 634 gCO2/kWh in Taiwan in 2025.
Why this comparison: both among the 20 largest electricity users.
Open this comparison in the interactive tool to add more countries or change the metric.
Key Facts
- Hydro supplied 52.1% of Brazil's electricity in 2025, against 1.9% in Taiwan.
- Taiwan's electricity was 5.8 times as carbon intensive as Brazil's in 2025, at 634 gCO2/kWh against 109 gCO2/kWh.
- The average person in Taiwan used 12.50 MWh of electricity in 2025, 3.5 times as much as in Brazil (3.58 MWh).
- Low carbon sources supplied 88.9% of Brazil's electricity in 2025 and 13.5% of Taiwan's.
- Electricity demand in 2025 was 775 TWh in Brazil and 289 TWh in Taiwan.
Key Figures, 2025
Ember annual statistics| Measure | Brazil | Taiwan |
|---|---|---|
| Total generation | 764 TWh | 289 TWh |
| Electricity demand | 775 TWh | 289 TWh |
| Demand per person | 3.58 MWh | 12.50 MWh |
| Carbon intensity | 109 gCO2/kWh | 634 gCO2/kWh |
| Power sector emissions | 83.4 MtCO2 | 183 MtCO2 |
| Low carbon share | 88.9% | 13.5% |
| Largest source | Hydro 52.1% | Gas 48.8% |
Generation Mix, 2025
Share of generationCarbon Intensity, 1985 to 2025
Ember annual statistics| Year | Brazil | Taiwan |
|---|---|---|
| 1985 | 61 gCO2/kWh | 331 gCO2/kWh |
| 1986 | 85 gCO2/kWh | 411 gCO2/kWh |
| 1987 | 74 gCO2/kWh | 393 gCO2/kWh |
| 1988 | 66 gCO2/kWh | 449 gCO2/kWh |
| 1989 | 66 gCO2/kWh | 494 gCO2/kWh |
| 1990 | 60 gCO2/kWh | 456 gCO2/kWh |
| 1991 | 62 gCO2/kWh | 485 gCO2/kWh |
| 1992 | 63 gCO2/kWh | 510 gCO2/kWh |
| 1993 | 61 gCO2/kWh | 553 gCO2/kWh |
| 1994 | 61 gCO2/kWh | 561 gCO2/kWh |
| 1995 | 63 gCO2/kWh | 570 gCO2/kWh |
| 1996 | 68 gCO2/kWh | 584 gCO2/kWh |
| 1997 | 71 gCO2/kWh | 602 gCO2/kWh |
| 1998 | 71 gCO2/kWh | 606 gCO2/kWh |
| 1999 | 90 gCO2/kWh | 612 gCO2/kWh |
| 2000 | 89 gCO2/kWh | 635 gCO2/kWh |
| 2001 | 106 gCO2/kWh | 654 gCO2/kWh |
| 2002 | 97 gCO2/kWh | 654 gCO2/kWh |
| 2003 | 91 gCO2/kWh | 666 gCO2/kWh |
| 2004 | 102 gCO2/kWh | 664 gCO2/kWh |
| 2005 | 99 gCO2/kWh | 665 gCO2/kWh |
| 2006 | 96 gCO2/kWh | 670 gCO2/kWh |
| 2007 | 91 gCO2/kWh | 670 gCO2/kWh |
| 2008 | 114 gCO2/kWh | 660 gCO2/kWh |
| 2009 | 87 gCO2/kWh | 658 gCO2/kWh |
| 2010 | 114 gCO2/kWh | 653 gCO2/kWh |
| 2011 | 100 gCO2/kWh | 653 gCO2/kWh |
| 2012 | 128 gCO2/kWh | 650 gCO2/kWh |
| 2013 | 168 gCO2/kWh | 644 gCO2/kWh |
| 2014 | 193 gCO2/kWh | 646 gCO2/kWh |
| 2015 | 189 gCO2/kWh | 650 gCO2/kWh |
| 2016 | 150 gCO2/kWh | 659 gCO2/kWh |
| 2017 | 156 gCO2/kWh | 685 gCO2/kWh |
| 2018 | 137 gCO2/kWh | 673 gCO2/kWh |
| 2019 | 142 gCO2/kWh | 649 gCO2/kWh |
| 2020 | 133 gCO2/kWh | 648 gCO2/kWh |
| 2021 | 168 gCO2/kWh | 652 gCO2/kWh |
| 2022 | 103 gCO2/kWh | 639 gCO2/kWh |
| 2023 | 96 gCO2/kWh | 644 gCO2/kWh |
| 2024 | 106 gCO2/kWh | 635 gCO2/kWh |
| 2025 | 109 gCO2/kWh | 634 gCO2/kWh |
Demand per Person, 1985 to 2025
Ember annual statistics| Year | Brazil | Taiwan |
|---|---|---|
| 1985 | n/a | n/a |
| 1986 | n/a | n/a |
| 1987 | n/a | n/a |
| 1988 | n/a | n/a |
| 1989 | n/a | n/a |
| 1990 | n/a | n/a |
| 1991 | n/a | n/a |
| 1992 | n/a | n/a |
| 1993 | n/a | n/a |
| 1994 | n/a | n/a |
| 1995 | n/a | n/a |
| 1996 | n/a | n/a |
| 1997 | n/a | n/a |
| 1998 | n/a | n/a |
| 1999 | n/a | n/a |
| 2000 | 2.25 MWh | 8.28 MWh |
| 2001 | 2.08 MWh | 8.40 MWh |
| 2002 | 2.14 MWh | 8.81 MWh |
| 2003 | 2.23 MWh | 9.22 MWh |
| 2004 | 2.33 MWh | 9.60 MWh |
| 2005 | 2.39 MWh | 9.97 MWh |
| 2006 | 2.47 MWh | 10.28 MWh |
| 2007 | 2.57 MWh | 10.57 MWh |
| 2008 | 2.66 MWh | 10.32 MWh |
| 2009 | 2.64 MWh | 9.93 MWh |
| 2010 | 2.84 MWh | 10.64 MWh |
| 2011 | 2.91 MWh | 10.83 MWh |
| 2012 | 3.01 MWh | 10.72 MWh |
| 2013 | 3.08 MWh | 10.78 MWh |
| 2014 | 3.12 MWh | 11.08 MWh |
| 2015 | 3.05 MWh | 10.97 MWh |
| 2016 | 3.05 MWh | 11.20 MWh |
| 2017 | 3.06 MWh | 11.44 MWh |
| 2018 | 3.09 MWh | 11.65 MWh |
| 2019 | 3.17 MWh | 11.58 MWh |
| 2020 | 3.13 MWh | 11.83 MWh |
| 2021 | 3.24 MWh | 12.35 MWh |
| 2022 | 3.28 MWh | 12.31 MWh |
| 2023 | 3.43 MWh | 12.11 MWh |
| 2024 | 3.57 MWh | 12.43 MWh |
| 2025 | 3.58 MWh | 12.50 MWh |
Brazil history · Taiwan history
Source: Ember (ember-energy.org), licensed under CC BY 4.0. Data as of 2025.
Related
Cite this page
World Power Monitor. (2025). Brazil vs Taiwan: Electricity Compared. https://worldpowermonitor.com/compare/brazil-vs-taiwan/
World Power Monitor. Brazil vs Taiwan: Electricity Compared. Data as of 2025. Data from Ember. https://worldpowermonitor.com/compare/brazil-vs-taiwan/
@misc{wpm_compare_brazil_vs_taiwan_2025,
title = {{Brazil vs Taiwan: Electricity Compared}},
author = {{World Power Monitor}},
year = {2025},
note = {Data as of 2025. Data from Ember.},
url = {https://worldpowermonitor.com/compare/brazil-vs-taiwan/}
} Permalink: https://worldpowermonitor.com/compare/brazil-vs-taiwan/
The Copy buttons add today's date as the access date.