South Korea vs Turkey: Electricity Compared
South Korea generated 628 TWh of electricity in 2025 and Turkey 354 TWh, according to Ember. Coal was the largest source in both, at 31.1% in South Korea and 34.3% in Turkey. Each kWh generated emitted 418 gCO2/kWh in South Korea and 476 gCO2/kWh in Turkey. These are Ember annual statistics for 2025, compiled from national sources; they are not real time.
Who is bigger and who is cleaner? South Korea is the bigger electricity producer, generating 1.8 times as much as Turkey in 2025 (628 TWh against 354 TWh). South Korea has the cleaner electricity by carbon intensity, at 418 gCO2/kWh against 476 gCO2/kWh in Turkey in 2025.
Why this comparison: both among the 20 largest electricity users.
Open this comparison in the interactive tool to add more countries or change the metric.
Key Facts
- Nuclear supplied 29.4% of South Korea's electricity in 2025, against none in Turkey.
- The average person in South Korea used 12.09 MWh of electricity in 2025, 3.0 times as much as in Turkey (4.01 MWh).
- Low carbon sources supplied 39.9% of South Korea's electricity in 2025 and 43.3% of Turkey's.
- Electricity demand in 2025 was 628 TWh in South Korea and 352 TWh in Turkey.
Key Figures, 2025
Ember annual statistics| Measure | South Korea | Turkey |
|---|---|---|
| Total generation | 628 TWh | 354 TWh |
| Electricity demand | 628 TWh | 352 TWh |
| Demand per person | 12.09 MWh | 4.01 MWh |
| Carbon intensity | 418 gCO2/kWh | 476 gCO2/kWh |
| Power sector emissions | 262 MtCO2 | 168 MtCO2 |
| Low carbon share | 39.9% | 43.3% |
| Largest source | Coal 31.1% | Coal 34.3% |
Generation Mix, 2025
Share of generation| Source | South Korea | Turkey |
|---|---|---|
| Coal | 31.1% | 34.3% |
| Nuclear | 29.4% | 0.0% |
| Gas | 28.0% | 22.1% |
| Hydro | 0.6% | 16.2% |
| Wind | 0.6% | 11.1% |
| Solar | 6.0% | 10.5% |
| Bioenergy | 3.2% | 2.4% |
| Other renewables | 0.0% | 3.0% |
| Other fossil | 1.0% | 0.3% |
Carbon Intensity, 1985 to 2025
Ember annual statistics| Year | South Korea | Turkey |
|---|---|---|
| 1985 | 524 gCO2/kWh | n/a |
| 1986 | 431 gCO2/kWh | n/a |
| 1987 | 345 gCO2/kWh | n/a |
| 1988 | 405 gCO2/kWh | n/a |
| 1989 | 383 gCO2/kWh | n/a |
| 1990 | 379 gCO2/kWh | 526 gCO2/kWh |
| 1991 | 399 gCO2/kWh | 539 gCO2/kWh |
| 1992 | 427 gCO2/kWh | 539 gCO2/kWh |
| 1993 | 451 gCO2/kWh | 481 gCO2/kWh |
| 1994 | 493 gCO2/kWh | 537 gCO2/kWh |
| 1995 | 479 gCO2/kWh | 505 gCO2/kWh |
| 1996 | 481 gCO2/kWh | 496 gCO2/kWh |
| 1997 | 492 gCO2/kWh | 519 gCO2/kWh |
| 1998 | 463 gCO2/kWh | 519 gCO2/kWh |
| 1999 | 453 gCO2/kWh | 557 gCO2/kWh |
| 2000 | 462 gCO2/kWh | 574 gCO2/kWh |
| 2001 | 475 gCO2/kWh | 605 gCO2/kWh |
| 2002 | 473 gCO2/kWh | 536 gCO2/kWh |
| 2003 | 458 gCO2/kWh | 525 gCO2/kWh |
| 2004 | 463 gCO2/kWh | 494 gCO2/kWh |
| 2005 | 450 gCO2/kWh | 544 gCO2/kWh |
| 2006 | 451 gCO2/kWh | 538 gCO2/kWh |
| 2007 | 474 gCO2/kWh | 578 gCO2/kWh |
| 2008 | 477 gCO2/kWh | 593 gCO2/kWh |
| 2009 | 495 gCO2/kWh | 577 gCO2/kWh |
| 2010 | 500 gCO2/kWh | 525 gCO2/kWh |
| 2011 | 497 gCO2/kWh | 541 gCO2/kWh |
| 2012 | 502 gCO2/kWh | 528 gCO2/kWh |
| 2013 | 512 gCO2/kWh | 510 gCO2/kWh |
| 2014 | 493 gCO2/kWh | 567 gCO2/kWh |
| 2015 | 488 gCO2/kWh | 505 gCO2/kWh |
| 2016 | 489 gCO2/kWh | 523 gCO2/kWh |
| 2017 | 511 gCO2/kWh | 535 gCO2/kWh |
| 2018 | 519 gCO2/kWh | 543 gCO2/kWh |
| 2019 | 497 gCO2/kWh | 490 gCO2/kWh |
| 2020 | 458 gCO2/kWh | 484 gCO2/kWh |
| 2021 | 460 gCO2/kWh | 502 gCO2/kWh |
| 2022 | 438 gCO2/kWh | 489 gCO2/kWh |
| 2023 | 427 gCO2/kWh | 495 gCO2/kWh |
| 2024 | 416 gCO2/kWh | 471 gCO2/kWh |
| 2025 | 418 gCO2/kWh | 476 gCO2/kWh |
Demand per Person, 1985 to 2025
Ember annual statistics| Year | South Korea | Turkey |
|---|---|---|
| 1985 | n/a | n/a |
| 1986 | n/a | n/a |
| 1987 | n/a | n/a |
| 1988 | n/a | n/a |
| 1989 | n/a | n/a |
| 1990 | n/a | n/a |
| 1991 | n/a | n/a |
| 1992 | n/a | n/a |
| 1993 | n/a | n/a |
| 1994 | n/a | n/a |
| 1995 | n/a | n/a |
| 1996 | n/a | n/a |
| 1997 | n/a | n/a |
| 1998 | n/a | n/a |
| 1999 | n/a | n/a |
| 2000 | 6.21 MWh | 1.95 MWh |
| 2001 | 6.59 MWh | 1.91 MWh |
| 2002 | 7.02 MWh | 1.96 MWh |
| 2003 | 7.32 MWh | 2.07 MWh |
| 2004 | 7.72 MWh | 2.17 MWh |
| 2005 | 8.14 MWh | 2.32 MWh |
| 2006 | 8.39 MWh | 2.49 MWh |
| 2007 | 8.83 MWh | 2.69 MWh |
| 2008 | 9.15 MWh | 2.77 MWh |
| 2009 | 9.32 MWh | 2.68 MWh |
| 2010 | 10.15 MWh | 2.87 MWh |
| 2011 | 10.55 MWh | 3.10 MWh |
| 2012 | 10.71 MWh | 3.22 MWh |
| 2013 | 10.73 MWh | 3.22 MWh |
| 2014 | 10.69 MWh | 3.30 MWh |
| 2015 | 10.75 MWh | 3.32 MWh |
| 2016 | 10.94 MWh | 3.42 MWh |
| 2017 | 11.20 MWh | 3.57 MWh |
| 2018 | 11.48 MWh | 3.55 MWh |
| 2019 | 11.34 MWh | 3.51 MWh |
| 2020 | 11.13 MWh | 3.50 MWh |
| 2021 | 11.72 MWh | 3.76 MWh |
| 2022 | 12.02 MWh | 3.71 MWh |
| 2023 | 11.93 MWh | 3.71 MWh |
| 2024 | 12.09 MWh | 3.89 MWh |
| 2025 | 12.09 MWh | 4.01 MWh |
South Korea history · Turkey history
Source: Ember (ember-energy.org), licensed under CC BY 4.0. Data as of 2025.
Related
Cite this page
World Power Monitor. (2025). South Korea vs Turkey: Electricity Compared. https://worldpowermonitor.com/compare/south-korea-vs-turkey/
World Power Monitor. South Korea vs Turkey: Electricity Compared. Data as of 2025. Data from Ember. https://worldpowermonitor.com/compare/south-korea-vs-turkey/
@misc{wpm_compare_south_korea_vs_turkey_2025,
title = {{South Korea vs Turkey: Electricity Compared}},
author = {{World Power Monitor}},
year = {2025},
note = {Data as of 2025. Data from Ember.},
url = {https://worldpowermonitor.com/compare/south-korea-vs-turkey/}
} Permalink: https://worldpowermonitor.com/compare/south-korea-vs-turkey/
The Copy buttons add today's date as the access date.